An arrogant judge, hard working immigrants and a pair of $65 million pants
Friday, 4 May 2007 | 243 readers so far
But the bulk of the $65 million comes from Pearson’s strict interpretation of D.C.’s consumer protection law, which fines violators $1,500 per violation, per day. According to court papers, Pearson added up 12 violations over 1,200 days, and then multiplied that by three defendants.
Much of Pearson’s case rests on two signs that Custom Cleaners once had on its walls: "Satisfaction Guaranteed" and "Same Day Service."
Based on Pearson’s dissatisfaction and the delay in getting back the pants, he claims the signs amount to fraud.
Pearson has appointed himself to represent all customers affected by such signs, though D.C. Superior Court Judge Neal Kravitz, who will hear the June 11 trial, has said that this is a case about one plaintiff, and one pair of pants.
According to Marc Fisher of the Washington Post, a legal defense fund has been established. You can contribute through the Chung family’s lawyer, Chris Manning.
Chris Manning
Manning & Sossamon PLLC
1532 Sixteenth Street NW
Washington, DC 20036
202) 387-2228
202) 387-2229 (Fax)
cmanning@manning-sossamon.com
http://www.manning-sossamon.com
You can read more about this case here.












1 May 4th, 2007 at 9:46 pm
Reb Barry's Blog ... neshamah.net says:
For a judge to seek damages that would represent a travesty of justice is absurd. For a judge who is part of the legal system to bring a lawsuit which brings ridicule to the legal system scandalous. Blogger The Will to Exist wrote “If I were a preacher, I would tell people there is a special place in hell for people like Roy Pearson.†I’m sure there is! Will to exist also has information if you would like to make a donation to the legal defense fund for the dry