transhumanist, transhuman, libertarian, gun rights advocate, individualist, citizen soldier, longevity, self-defense, cryonics, freedom activism, technology, diet,

Anyone fired this beauty? Springfield Armory XD Sub Compact .40 S&W

XD9802HCSP06  Black

I think I’m going to buy one of these when I get home. Anyone have any practical experience with Springfield Armory weapons? I have a Glock 23 already and I’m really quite taken with the .40 S&W round. This pistol just looks fun to shoot. I should be able to get one for $400. Maybe $650 by the time I get done with accessories.

Spread this meme:
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Fark
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Google
  • Digg
  • Reddit

Related posts:


  1. Pingback from glock 29 convert 40sw

    [...] home. Anyone have any practical experience with Springfield Armory weapons? I have a glock 23 …http://willtoexist.com/2006/02/09/anyone-fired-this-beauty/trackback/.357 Sig Vs .40 S&ampW - Gun and Game ForumsMay 28, 2003 … I bought a conversion barrel from glock [...]

  2. Pingback from Springfield Armory Xd 40 - Web - WebCrawler

    [...] a … http://www.policelink.com/products/products/1275-springfi... [Found on Windows Live] Anyone fired this beauty? Springfield Armory XD Sub Compact .40 S… … get home. Anyone have any practical experience with Springfield Armory weapons? I have a [...]

  3. armyscout posted the following on April 25, 2008 at 2:28 am.

    P.S. i own an xd-9 tactical, an xd-45 service. (no subcompacts), a Glock 17, A kimber Desert Warrior , A springfield TRP, and a SIG p-220. A sig-556 carbine, and a Olympic arms m4 in 6.8 SPC.

    XD-45 bitone (green/stainless) service is my favorite, and constant carry. 4200 rounds, 20 yard POA/POI. 0 Failure to feed. 0 Failure to fire. 0 failure to eject. windy, desert, high altitude environment.

    If you dont like the XD consider if you are just brand bashing, or are you compaints legitimate? :) ITS ok to love Glock as well.
    For you guys that are throwing in the comments about your Ruger autoloaders…..Please dont ever speak in public again… If you wanna bash trash there are plenty of berettas and rugers to choose from just pick one.

    Reply to armyscout
  4. armyscout posted the following on April 25, 2008 at 2:09 am.

    ALLEN,  i think perhaps you are just trolling. At no where, at NO time is the xd-45 “known” for failures to feed.  “.45 failure to feed” and “sensitive to limp wrist” in the same paragraph highly suggests the failure is in your application, not the weapon. NO weapon is designed to operate properly if you limp wrist the weapon  ( see books on Isaac Newton, Physics 101, gravity and Inertia are our friends, etc…) 
    As a veteran, PMC, and tactical competition shooter I can tell you that you will be shopping for a while if you try to find a better pistol than the Croatian HS200/ SA XD. period. You want it to feed?? Grip it properly. GLOCK wont feed from a limp wrist either, neither will your 3000 dollar les Baer /Wilson / Rock River super 1911. You want it to shoot sub-inch groups? quit shooting at cans with your drunk cousin, and go get some quality tactical training from a reputable source, and practice,practice,practice. 90% of the time it is not the weapon, it IS the shooter that is screwing up (regardless of the weapon).
    On another note, I dont know a single cop that would be dumb enough to carry his duty weapon or OFF-DUTY weapon in condition 3.
    No bullet in chamber= hollow handled hammer. 
    LOL one more thing ( a personal menacing gripe)  HANDGUNS DO NOT FIRE “SHELLS” NOR ARE THEY FED BY “CLIPS”.
    ROUNDS, CARTRIDGES, AMMO ETC… WILL DO BUT NOT “SHELLS”.  HANDGUNS ARE FED BY MAGAZINES…SAY IT WITH ME M-A-G-A-Z-I-N-E-S. IF YOU ARE RELOADING IN A GUNFIGHT,AND YOU FIND YOURSELF RELOADING WITH CLIPS 1. YOU ARE ALREADY DEAD. 2. YOU FOUND YOUR PAPPY’S OL’RIFLE 3. YOUR IN A CHEEZY VIETNAM MOVIE WITH A RICE HAT ON YOUR HEAD.

    THANK YOU, THAT IS ALL.
    CARRY ON.
    The guys leaving the negative comments most probably cant shoot anyway

    Reply to armyscout
  5. Trevor posted the following on April 17, 2008 at 8:37 am.

    Jeff,

    I’m going to have to check out “Thunderwear” now.

    Reply to Trevor
  6. Jeff posted the following on April 15, 2008 at 4:17 pm.

    I purchased an XD40 SubCompact and I love it. I sold my Glock 27 about 6 months ago, and was sorry I ever got rid of it…until I held this little beauty. I am more accurate and faster with this weapon than I was with the G27. I love the ease of breakdown and cleaning. I carry concealed using Thunderwear. It is an awesome holster that allows me to carry no matter what I wear.

    Reply to Jeff
  7. Sgt. K. Weygandt posted the following on March 26, 2008 at 1:36 pm.

    Still shooting the XD Sub Compact .40 S&W and use it as my off duty weapon. Still no Jams! Easy to tear down and clean!….especially for those of you who avoid this needed procedure.

    I still prefere an H&K as a Duty Weapon, however, for those of you who have had the opportunity to combat shoot and re-load, shooting at multiple targets…this is a nice piece.

    Sgt. K. Weygandt

    Reply to Sgt. K. Weygandt
  8. Armstrong posted the following on March 21, 2008 at 6:42 pm.

    I have been shooting Firearms since I was 9. I am now 29, and I am purchasing a new gun today. Most of the 1911’s I was looking at are quiet pricey. I noticed the 45 XD and it caught my attention. After my research, I have come to the conclusion that the XD is the route I am choosing. Going today after work!

    Reply to Armstrong
  9. Gringo_Malo posted the following on March 21, 2008 at 11:53 am.

    So, did you ever buy the XD, Trevor? Last January, I bought a Glock 22 with tritium sights for $499.95, $541 and change out the door. I believe the vendor had the 23 at the same price, but I wanted a full size pistol.

    All the XDs I saw were going for about $550 before tax without night sights. I feel guilty about not contributing to my distant cousins in Croatia, but not an extra two hundred bucks (for night sights and sales tax) worth. The Glock is now my primary home defense weapon. Glocks really do rock.

    Reply to Gringo_Malo
  10. Trevor posted the following on March 20, 2008 at 8:14 am.

    Your personal test is a pretty good one skoolzone. Of course, at some point, you’re going to have to clean it.

    Reply to Trevor
  11. skoolzone posted the following on March 19, 2008 at 10:48 pm.

    My friend bugged me until i sold him my xd compact 45. I wanted somthing smaller to carry,and found the 40 sub compact . I believe it is a very reliable carry weapon, and i carry it daily. Very accurate , functional, compact . Heck what more can i say …. over 1500 rounds through it . Oh yea , this will piss everybody off, my own little twisted personal test … i haven’t cleaned it yet. Oh crap here comes the rhetoric! Yeeeehaaaaa! Go for it , buy it , you will not be dissapointed.

    Reply to skoolzone
  12. Allen posted the following on March 5, 2008 at 12:26 am.

    I have owned the XD .40C then traded it for the XD .45 service model when it came out. I will say this gun is very accurate however it is known for failure to feeds, mine personally will fail 2-3 times in 200 rounds. this is with 3 different magazines and various manufactured 230 grain target loads. I have sent it in to springfield were they said they adjusted the extractor however the problem still exists. The .45ACP seems to be very sensitive to limp wristing also, my glock 21 (.45 5″) has never failed, I personally wouldnt trust the XD in .45ACP as a duty or carry gun. Just my experiances…..

    Reply to Allen
  13. Alan posted the following on February 21, 2008 at 6:10 pm.

    I’ve owned a XD in 9mm for several years now. I bought it for self and home protection. One night a couple of years ago, my wife said she heard our dog parking alot outside. I got my XD and a big flashlight and went outside to see what was going on with my dog. I stood about 20 yards from the pen and shined the flashlight into his pen. My dog was standing in his pen parking, the door of the pen was open. The next thing I knew he stood up and locked his front legs around a black bear already standing up in his pen. They started growling and biting each other. I raised my XD in my right hand and flashlight in the left, yelled my dogs name. As he started to come down to all fours, I fired one shot, hitting the bear in the chest. He started to run out of the pen and as I was stepping backwards fired again and hit him in the head. The bear dropped halfway out the doorway dead. 2 shots both one handed is all it took. I just purchased a .40 cal XD, but haven’t fired it yet. Can’t wait.

    Reply to Alan
  14. Pete posted the following on February 16, 2008 at 6:22 pm.

    I’ve had the 4 inch model for like 2 years now. I dont shoot it an awful lot, but when I do I put atleast 200 rnds per visit thru it. I dont clean it as much as I should either.
    So far no jams and multiple different kinds of loads. I can send 13 shots thru this thing without any flaw all the time.
    Awesome gun for the money.
    My friend has all top dollar guns and always wants to shoot my XD

    Reply to Pete
  15. Tony posted the following on February 10, 2008 at 3:49 am.

    I love the way the sub compact XD feels. It is easier to conceal and I shoot better with this than my duty weapon Glock 22.

    Reply to Tony
  16. Joel posted the following on January 25, 2008 at 2:13 pm.

    I have the XD-40 sub compact, and I have fired around 3000 rounds of range ammo, reloads, walmart winchester target ammo, and I have never had a single jam.
    In my humble opinion the XD is superior to the Glock because Springfield used the best features of Glock and incorporated the best features of the 1911 into one gun. The grip safety gives me a lot of confidence when carrying everyday.

    Reply to Joel
  17. Sgt. Kyle Weygandt posted the following on January 22, 2008 at 10:40 pm.

    I have always been an H&K person until I purchased my XD Sub Compact .40 S&W.
    Now I now give a thumbs up to both of these guns.

    I really like the safety features on my Springfield and the fact that I can rub my finger across the top of the gun to check if their is a round in the chamber, this is a great feature.

    For a small compact, I am able to keep my patterns very tight, and the control of this super gun is better than a compact Glock or H&K.

    I am still an advocate of the H&K as a duty weapon, for an off duty weapon, the XD Sub Compact .40 S&W is hard to beat!

    Sgt. Kyle E. Weygandt
    Magnolia Police Department

    Reply to Sgt. Kyle Weygandt
  18. justin posted the following on December 29, 2007 at 3:00 pm.

    yes but it is in a 9mm but it is a awsome subcompact

    Reply to justin
  19. Pingback from Glock 29 Convert 40sw - Dogpile Web Search

    [...] http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=237380&page=2 [Found on Google, Yahoo! Search] 4. the will to exist - Anyone fired this beauty? Springfield Armory XD Sub Compact .4… … of the XD, and I am now a convert to the Springfield side of the Force. … without [...]

  20. Rudy posted the following on December 26, 2007 at 2:00 pm.

    I feel sorry for Jake Mank #10 on the list he must have gotten an abused XD or it was never cleaned correctly. I have been carrying my XD-40 for quite some time as a duty weapon. I have never had a misfire-stovepipe or any other problems with it. As a matter of fact i bought a second one to carry off duty this was done so that i could have 2. I am not a big fan of the Glock but credit must be given where credit is due they are also a nice weapon.I am now looking at the XD-45 this is also a nice weapon. My buddy has the sub-compact 9mm and him and i go to the range and fire off around 200-300 rounds each and no problems.All right guy’s this might hurt a little but those of you that are having problems try squeezing your grip a little harder and you will have less misfires and stovepipes.My wife has also fired the 9mm the.40cal and the 45. and has never once had a problem so come on guy’s get a grip and you will do fine. I highly recommend this weapon.Good luck to all.

    Rudy

    Reply to Rudy
  21. Jeremy Shaffer posted the following on December 24, 2007 at 11:04 pm.

    I shot the XD, the grip is nice and small, could use one of those rubber band wrap around grips, that would be perfect. Trigger is the best out of the box ever. Got great shot groups with the .40 cal. I want to buy one!

    Reply to Jeremy Shaffer
  22. Pingback from War Veteran video compilations - By War Veteran Videos

    Recent Comments Kath on Springfield Armory XD Sub Compact .40 vs. Smith & Wesson M&P .40 Lady’s view: I bought an XD-40 for my new carry gun after tryi …Scouton Anyone fired this beauty? Springfield Armory XD Sub Compact .40 S&W I currently own the XD-45 compact, XD-9 subcompact and the XD-40 …Jack Zumwalt on Springfield Armory XD Sub Compact .40 vs. Smith

  23. Scout posted the following on November 21, 2007 at 2:47 pm.

    I currently own the XD-45 compact, XD-9 subcompact and the XD-40 subcompact. I’ve owned them for a few months and shoot about 500 rounds a weekend through each.
    I love the XD-40 and carry it every day in an OTWB paddle holster. When I was first breaking the XD-40 in, it locked to the rear quite often, but that was because my thumb was hitting the slide lock. Once I determined this was the problem and changed my grip, no problems.
    Of the thousands of rounds I’ve fired through the XD-40 (for that matter all of my XD’s) other than the above mentioned problem, I haven’t had a single failure.
    I’ve owned Kimber, Tarus and Glock and several 1911’s but have recently sold all of them except my Springfieeld Armory matchgrade 1911 because the XD is such a great pistol.

    Reply to Scout
  24. Ben posted the following on August 22, 2007 at 12:40 am.

    I’ve gone over the three thousand round mark with my XD40 tatical. Have not had any jams. Great gun.

    Reply to Ben
  25. calista posted the following on July 1, 2007 at 4:29 am.

    Read some comments saying that it recoils less than a glock 26. Not true. They may both have double recoil springs ala Khar (the best to conceal shoot and handle in a metal frame, for my size) but the xd has a higher barrel axis, ie sitting higher on top of your hand. I had the xd9. it did not shoot better than my glock. Its a good gun in 9mm, robust, natural pointer, good trigger, but its at home because its bulkier and heavier with no real advantages over the g26.

    Reply to calista
  26. Ronnie J. Burch posted the following on June 27, 2007 at 1:26 pm.

    I have a XD .40 I haven’t found anything to not like about it. A very sweet shooter and a good carry gun.

    Reply to Ronnie J. Burch
  27. Tommy S. posted the following on February 14, 2007 at 5:46 am.

    Thanks guys for all the info.Currently have money down on XD40 sub compact.Someone was right when they said their hard to find in Texas.My brother-in-law bought XD9 and loves it.This gun is a bargain for what comes with it and with 2 kids the safety features are a plus.Thanks again for the comments.

    Reply to Tommy S.
  28. Dan H. posted the following on February 3, 2007 at 8:02 pm.

    Re: Bart Stevens May 30,2006. I have the same problem you had with my sub-compact shooting to the left. My rear sight is definately off center to the left. An officer friend told me it probably could be tapped over as there are no obvious signs of locations to adjust it. What is the toll you used? Thank you for your comments regarding other guns. I own a Ruger .45 and an eaa .40. both are excellend weapons and shoot great. The .45 however is a little too laarge for my hand and is too large too conceal. the .40 fits perfect but still too large too conceal. My xd 40 sub-compact, which i too fell in love with after going through the 1st 3 mags, is perfect for me in fit and concealment. give Texas a big howdy froma PA Texan.
    To Trevor in Iraq. (March 1,2006)Thank you sincerely for your service. You deserve and xd!
    Those looking for the xd’s should look to Cabella’s. Harrisburg, PA location had a load.

    Reply to Dan H.
  29. Ariel Miller posted the following on January 26, 2007 at 7:10 pm.

    Commenting on comment #2 re. the Taurus 24/7. It does have a “single action double action” - good description. Try one and you’ll see. The striker is typically pre-cocked by the action of the slide and has a light “single action” pull. If it doesn’t go bang for some reason, like a light strike or hard primer, another squeeze of the trigger, more of a “double-action” pull since the striker isn’t pre-cocked, will strike the primer again. This multiple strike capability is one of the best features of the pistol, IMO and should be copied immediately by Glock, Kahr, and Springfield - all of which only allow the first strike. If that doesn’t work, the slide has to be racked manually to recock the striker.

    Reply to Ariel Miller
  30. Brian B. posted the following on January 23, 2007 at 8:38 am.

    For the record…

    I am a law enforcement officer. My father is a law enforcement officer, My brother is a law enforcement officer… My uncle is a law enforcement officer, most of our friends are law enforcements officers… I think you get the point.

    In the many years of being associated with LEO’s, I have seen a few that don’t carry a loaded and charged semi-auto. On the other hand, I can’t say I have ever heard of an agency that required their officers to carry their semi-auto weapon without a round chambered. I think the general consensus on that would be that a LEO should always be ready to defend himself or others and that ability would be greatly diminished if he first had to charge his weapon before being able to respond to a threat. But those I mentioned earlier prefer not to carry charged weapons because they feel safer around their own kids, or other people’s kids, and the public in general. They figure if someone was to get their weapon from them, or come across their uncharged weapon, by the time that person realized that the weapon failed to fire, their spare could be drawn, they could be well out of harms way, or disarm the individual by then. However, I do not agree with this mindset. BE PREPARED!

    Now to the XD: I fired an XD40 Two-Tone 4″ today and fell deeply in love with the weapon. I shot a tighter grouping with it than any other weapon I have ever shot besides my dad’s Colt 1911 .45 ACP Competition Series (I nornmally shoot a 117-120 out of 120 on the course).

    We put over 200 reloaded rounds through the XD40 with one (1) malfunction (failure to feed). Comparatively, I would have had maybe two or three (2 or 3) of the same type failures through my Sig P226 (Duty) with the same amount of rejacketed rounds. I found the trigger pull to be smooth and consistent and the weapon felt very comfortable in my hands. On the downside, I still have the red mark on my thumb from the massive recoil generated by the XD earlier today. Actually, shooting the gun was not fun. The score it produced, on the other had, made it worth it. I am now looking to try a XD9 SUB to possibly carry as a backup/off duty weapon. When I find one and fire it, I’ll let you all know.

    Reply to Brian B.
  31. Jack MacCarty posted the following on January 22, 2007 at 11:57 pm.

    “Brian, you say you’re an officer - does that mean military, or police? Frankly, I don’t think that you’re either from the comments you posted. Both LEOs and Military Police/Security Forces carry loaded and chambered. I’ve worked for both. I recently did a tour with the Security Forces squadron at my base, and we carried the M9 (of couse), loaded with hollowpoints, round in the chamber, safety OFF but hammer de-cocked. I guess that’s necessary when protecting $30M fighter aircraft, but I didnt for one second feel unsafe doing it. We had a 30 foot standoff distance for persons armed with edged weapons - if I had to draw my sidearm, all I needed to do was pull the trigger. Police officers also carry with a round in the chamber.”
    Comment by JB — December 28, 2006 @ 7:58 pm

    Are you so sure that all police are required to carry their service weapon chambered? From what I understand… State to state, precinct to to precinct, rules, can and do, change from time to time….

    Lets try to keep an objective mind while posting, eh?

    Reply to Jack MacCarty
  32. XTeacher posted the following on January 17, 2007 at 1:54 am.

    Hey folks,

    Good discussion. I bought a XD 40 sub-compact for CCW about two weeks ago and absolutely love it. So far, I’ve only put 300 rounds through it but have had absolutely no problems. It was a toss-up between the Glock 30 and the XD, and after having fired my dad’s Glock 30 and merely handling the XD, I was completely won over by the way it felt in my hand as compared to the Glock, which, by the way, is a fine weapon. . . .in fact, I think that for my next purchase (once I remove my testicles from my wife’s purse where she has kept them since I bought a new gun without consulting her), I’ll probably get a Glock 29 just to try out the 10mm. Heck, to be honest, I have’t encountered too many handguns that I haven’t liked, so maybe I’m not the most discriminating shooter.

    What surpised me most is the fact that on my second trip to the range, I shot the XD nearly as well as I shot my 1911 (which is still my favorite, but a little unwieldy for concealment as a full-frame). I feel confident enough with the XD’s safety features to carry it ready to fire, but I find myself flicking a phantom thumb safety whenever I do draw and fire drills. The fact that any police dept. would prefer the Israeli draw truly frightens me b/c in a stressful situtation, I see the potential for a negligent discharge by those who are not exceptionally well-trained in drawing in this fashion, and I or my kid might be in the vicinity of such a ND one day. FWIW, I am not a police officer.

    Reply to XTeacher
  33. Shenard posted the following on January 10, 2007 at 11:36 pm.

    I have the XD9 SC and it’s the best gun I’ve ever shot or owned. It’s so comfortable & easy to grip, my aim is much better on this gun than any other gun. I also have a glock & S&W 9mm but this is my gun of choice.

    Reply to Shenard
  34. Dan posted the following on January 10, 2007 at 8:02 pm.

    I bought a XD40 service model about a year ago, great gun. The only problem I have had with it was that the rear sight was a little off, but nothing a brass punch and a several rounds couldn’t fix. Other than that, I have put around 4,000 rounds through it (several brands of factory loads), consistently accurate, and has never jammed. I have heard alot of people complaining about the use of multiple safeties (grip + trigger), but if you know how to handle a gun, you will not even notice them.

    Reply to Dan
  35. Steve B. posted the following on January 10, 2007 at 2:10 am.

    Just purchased a new XD40 sub from the Gun Show at Dulles Expo Center in Virginia for $459.00, which included the pistol pack (case packed full of goodies). Considered several compacts for upgrading my primary CCW carry from an old but reliable S&W .38 Snubnose. Final deciding factor over several makes considered….XD40 most comfortable and very natural grip feel. I actually feel in control of the weapon, not “adapting” to it’s grips. First box of rounds were Federal .40 S&W (FBI Load) - no problems at all. Right out of the box, I was amazed at the XD40’s accuracy, stability, natural point and aim ability, and the smoothness of the action on recoil, (very smooth and light in my opinion). I loved shooting my Barretta 92F for years, but the XD40 was simply a pleasure to shoot and conceals very easily! Not only did I shoot better than expected for a sub-compact, even my 74 yr old father (Korean War Marine), who is not “into” guns, took it for a test fire with me this weekend and shot an impressive group (half dollar size) at 25′. His basic marksmanship knowledge served him well, the XD40 delivered the confidence he deserved!

    Reply to Steve B.
  36. jon posted the following on January 1, 2007 at 9:46 pm.

    If you look up the springfield armory website you will see that they have a selection of xd’s that have ported barrels for less recoil- I will hopefully be buying one shortly!

    Reply to jon
  37. Brian F. posted the following on January 1, 2007 at 9:30 am.

    JB - Thanks for the post. I think I’ll be moving to the XD40. One other post I’d read on Packing.org suggested looking into a 40 barrel as the slides and frame were the same, that would be good if the cost were comparable, but I think given the need to choose I’ll be moving up 1 cal. Thanks for your input.

    ~Brian

    Reply to Brian F.
  38. JB posted the following on December 31, 2006 at 6:19 am.

    Brian, I’ve shot the G27 and the XD40. Haven’t shot the XD9, but have fired many 9mm guns. Yes, the G27 is a hand cannon. I don’t care for it either. The XD40, while a bit zippier than any 9mm would be, is very managable. Target reaquisition is very fast, especially compared to the G27 because of the (in my opinion) better grip angle.

    Reply to JB
  39. Brian F. posted the following on December 29, 2006 at 12:08 pm.

    Does anyone have any first hand info on the comparison between the XD9sub and the XD40sub in terms of recoil and acurracy? I have the XD-9 as one of my ccw weapons, and despite the short barrel, I find it to be extremely acurrate, even well beyond any range at which one should reasonably expect to defensively engage an adversary. While a 9mm with the proper ammo config is certainly capable of stopping an offender, I would prefer a larger round with higher stopping power. Shot a friend’s Glock 27 and didn’t care for the recoil. Not that it was excessive, but it was far “snappier” than the XD-9, or even a Springfield 1911 .45. Just not smooth at all and more difficult to resight for follow-on shots. Considering moving to the XD-40, has anyone fired all three? (XD9, XD40, Glock-27) who would be willing to provide a comparison? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks, Brian.

    Reply to Brian F.
  40. JB posted the following on December 28, 2006 at 7:58 pm.

    Sorry, I’m going back a couple of posts to add my .02 regarding carrying without a round in the chamber.

    Brian, you say you’re an officer - does that mean military, or police? Frankly, I don’t think that you’re either from the comments you posted. Both LEOs and Military Police/Security Forces carry loaded and chambered. I’ve worked for both. I recently did a tour with the Security Forces squadron at my base, and we carried the M9 (of couse), loaded with hollowpoints, round in the chamber, safety OFF but hammer de-cocked. I guess that’s necessary when protecting $30M fighter aircraft, but I didnt for one second feel unsafe doing it. We had a 30 foot standoff distance for persons armed with edged weapons - if I had to draw my sidearm, all I needed to do was pull the trigger. Police officers also carry with a round in the chamber.

    I’m going to be purchasing an XD40 in a couple of days to use as my primary duty weapon for a law enforcement agency I was recently hired onto. I’ll post my comments after I fire it, but I can say that after only holding it, I was sold. It points very naturally, and it is very comfortable to hold.

    Mike, the grip safety doesnt bother me in the slightest, either. It fully depresses when the gun is properly held, so it shouldn’t be and issue when firing unless you limp-wrist the gun - and if you do that, the gun wont fire! If you’re concerned about it, try to find a range that has a rental XD and try it out. I doubt you’ll be bothered by it when shooting, but every person is different. Good luck!

    Reply to JB
  41. Carson posted the following on December 22, 2006 at 4:57 am.

    I have the XD service model 9mm. It is a great gun and I would recommend it to anyone. I like it so muck that I am getting the XD .40 subcompact. I like the extended clip and if it performs like my 9mm I will be more than satisfied. I frequent the range and have shot most of the 9mm that are available to rent. I think the springfield XD shoots the best!

    Reply to Carson
  42. Rob posted the following on December 14, 2006 at 8:59 pm.

    I own the XD .45ACP and I have pumped about 1000 rounds through it.. Never jammed and is very smooth straight out of the box.

    Reply to Rob
  43. MGB posted the following on November 29, 2006 at 12:36 am.

    I am trying to buy an XD40 sub compact and cannot find one. I have heard Springfield is sold out for several months. Does anyone know where to buy one in Texas?

    Reply to MGB
  44. Marvin posted the following on November 22, 2006 at 11:27 pm.

    I have shot Fiocci 9mm, 40 and 45 in XD and XD SC for 5 years and have never had a failure of the ammo or the pistol. I would not have anything but SA XD pistols. They just work.

    Reply to Marvin
  45. Michael posted the following on November 20, 2006 at 9:03 pm.

    I just wanted to add my 2 cents to the forum. I bought the xd 40 just about 4 months ago and I LOVE IT. I’ve put somewhere around 1200 rounds through it so far with not even a hint of trouble. Accuracy is excellent, and it is just a pure joy to fire. I’ve been around guns my whole life and have fired more handguns than I can count “20+ years in the military helped” and the XD is by far the best. Glocks can’t even compare. EXCELLENT WEAPON.

    Reply to Michael
  46. Joe posted the following on November 13, 2006 at 2:34 am.

    I have owned my XD-40 sub-compact for over a year and it is by far the finest weapon I’ve owned. I have ran over 1500 rds through it and have never had a jam. If you want it as your carry weapon I wouldn’t buy the tricked out package with the light and the 12 rd mag as I have trouble concealing it with the extended mag in. Save 50 bucks and skip the light as the only thing I have ever used it for was a time my power went out! Also if your a novice I don’t think you will find an easier weapon to maintain. You can completely strip it in about 15 seconds. All in all if you have the need buy an XD pistol! I also own a service model XD-9 and once again after nearly 2000 rds through that one not a single jam.

    Reply to Joe
  47. gary chang last of the algonquins posted the following on November 12, 2006 at 9:53 am.

    just wanted to say how much i love the XD .40cal net to the colt python this is my favorite pistol to shoot i even started carrying the XD40 in stead of my Berretta its just more comfterble and you cant go wrong with a .40 more stopping power and it can get through walls and windows without more than one round unlike the 9mm

    Reply to gary chang last of the algonquins
  48. patrick posted the following on November 12, 2006 at 9:48 am.

    i recently bought the XD40 .40cal and love it i hope the army goes back to the .45 because the 9mm is not living up to standards on the battle field

    Reply to patrick
  49. Adam posted the following on November 9, 2006 at 12:14 pm.

    New XD-45ACP COMPACT:
    Springfield has just come out with a XD 45ACP “Compact”, which maintains the 4″ bbl of the service model, but chops the butt by 3/4″. Almost exact size of a Glock 19/23, but a 10 shot 45ACP. They also have the XDGear Mag/grip extentions for it, so you can use full size 45ACP mags in it and grip 3 fingers instead of two. 3/4 ” shorter butt might not seem like much, but it really makes a big dif. when carrying around all day. The longer bbl. reduces felt recoil and increases practical accuracy, so it might be a real nice solution for those wanting both a CCW carry gun and a duty gun all in one.

    9MM vs 40CAL:
    As for which caliber to go with for the XD-SC, I have the .40, the girlfriend has the 9mm. If you’re a girl, have girlish proportions, are new to shooting, or are going to burn through 200 rounds a weekend in IDPA shoots, go with the 9mm. Otherwise, the 40 Cal wins in my book. It has the better balistics by about 20% and regardless of the age old debate of calibers, 20% more energy is a better thing to have than not. Of course, you pay for it in recoil (I’d say you feel that 20% in increased recoil over the 9mm), but it’s not so much as to slow me down in speed or accuracy for 7 yard double taps, so I think it’s good to go for for a seasoned shooter.

    AMMO NOTE:
    If you are going to carry Cor-bon ammo in the XD-SC’s, make sure and fire them as your first mag durring each range visit… they are significantly more snappy then the Winchester White Box from Walmart you brought to train with (about an extra 30-40% over that White Box), so you should get used to that snap by shooting it first off.

    Reply to Adam
  50. Michael posted the following on November 9, 2006 at 12:23 am.

    I just purchased the xd 40 4″ service model and took it to the local range yesterday for the first time. I put just over 200 rounds through it with no sign of any problems at all. As far as being accurate you can’t beat it. Great weapon.
    I carry “or carried” a Ruger P95 9mm for several years and it looks like it’s been replaced.
    As far as recommendations you can’t do much better than the XD 40. After you get your hands on one you’ll be hooked.

    Reply to Michael
  51. Zak posted the following on November 1, 2006 at 1:47 am.

    I’m in the market for a handgun to be used for home protection and range. What is the recommended way of getting my hands on one? Should I go pick one up at the local shop, or search around? Anyone with some insight would be great to hear from. I’m a rifle and shotgun owner, but I am new to purchasing handguns. Would you also recommend a 9 or 40?
    Thanks

    Zak

    Reply to Zak
  52. James posted the following on October 30, 2006 at 11:08 pm.

    Now to comment on my new XD-45 w/4″ barrel. WOW! I held one at a gun show a couple weeks ago and was immediately impressed with its balance, the fact if had ambidexterous mag release. (Being left handed, it is nice to see a manufacturer go the extra mile to make me feel that as a significant minority in the world population, my needs are importaint.) ()-: It feels even better with a fully loaded clip! I had decided that a 45 would be my choice for personal defense and a relative suggested I look into Springfield. I had not yet done a lot of research and therefore wasn’t ready to make a desicion. But about an hour later I went back to the table with the XDs and picked up the 45 again. It felt natural in my hand. The gun shop owner must have remembered me from earlier and said let me make you a deal on that. And that he did!

    I have only put about 300 rounds through it so far — Wolf 230gr. FMJ, Blazer 230gr. FMJ and Federal HydraShock 185gr. Thus far, no misfires or jams. I have yet to test the Hornady 185gr. JHP/XTP round for personal defense purposes. I also want to test a couple more brands of FMJ for practice. But at this point, Wolf holds the lead for price and reliability.

    Reply to James
  53. James posted the following on October 30, 2006 at 10:48 pm.

    Kevinc46205 asked about ammo for personal/home protection and range shooting. My opinion is that you should not use FMJ for personal/home protection. It is fine for practice. However, if you NEED to stop an attacker, the bullet must expand and not pass through the criminal. I have an XD-45 and the retired police officer at the gun shoppe recommended Hornady JHP/XTP for defense. The Federal HydraShock is also a good defense round according to a conceal carry instructor I know. I have fired this round a few times and saw the expansion, it was impressive. I have not fired any Hornady yet, but I will next time I practice. A quality weapon is only part of the equation; quality ammo is the other part — it is probably more importaint. When it comes to protecting your loved ones and yourself, $25.00 for 50 rounds of ammo that will put down an attacker isn’t too much.

    Reply to James
  54. Jay posted the following on October 11, 2006 at 7:21 am.

    I am currently deciding between the sub-compact XD .40 and 9mm. Having tried them both out at my local range I am leaning towards the 9mm.

    The .40 rental gun jammed on me about 4 to 5 times during 50 rounds. No problems with the 9mm. Granted it just probably needed a clean, but from what I have read the .40 XD is less reliable, and perhaps .40 ammo is less accurate in general.

    For me the sub-compact will be my first carry pistol, as I have signed up for a CCW class.

    I am far more accurate shooting a 1911, even compact 1911’s, but due to the weight I lose that edge after shooting for a while.

    It appears that most of the people posting here prefer the .40. Can someone post why they prefer this for personal defense.

    Thanks,
    Jay.

    Reply to Jay
  55. Sgt_rock posted the following on October 10, 2006 at 5:06 am.

    Just shot my XD-40 Service Model (4″ barrel) for the first time yesterday - fantastic side arm! I was concerned about moving away from my BHP .40 to a ‘plastic gun’ because of the trigger. I never took to the glock trigger or the over all feel of them. The XD-40 is distinicly different from the glock and the trigger is great. Mine only has 150 rounds throught it, but so far I’m pleased.

    Reply to Sgt_rock
  56. Jess aumiller posted the following on October 2, 2006 at 10:11 am.

    Have put 800 rounds in my new SpringField XD9 service and have had zero issues.
    It’s the Glock on Crack! I love it as my all in one sidearm.
    I have shot and own alot of hand guns, Walther, Sig, Glock, Colt, Ruger and my favorite to date is the XD. They took what works from other guns and put it all into one…. :)

    Reply to Jess aumiller
  57. Dominic posted the following on September 25, 2006 at 5:50 am.

    Oh and I almost forgot, some of you who are really amped about the .40 S&W calibers but aren’t too hip to the .45 ACP chambering, I’d like for you to remember that Springfield has just recently created an XD pistol with the new Glock chambered .45 round. It’s the Springfield XD .45 GAP, which I haven’t shot yet but would really like to. I’ve read all the reviews and its a far easier load to control than that of your typical .45 ACP.

    Reply to Dominic
  58. Dominic posted the following on September 25, 2006 at 5:34 am.

    I have owned my XD-40 for a little over a year now and I absolutely love it. I just cleaned it for the first time a few days ago and have never had any problems with it. It did end up jamming one time when I attempted to shoot some of my cousins PCI rounds out of it. I’ve found that this weapon really prefers steel jacketed Wolf rounds, Hydra-shock Federal, Safety slugs, and reloads where there is no indentation between the bullet and the casing. It has to be smooth all the way down fellas. Aside from its slightly touchy attitude towards ammo I love my XD. In fact, I love it so much when I move to Arizona and join the police department, I’m going to ask if I can use an XD for carrying. Furthermore I love the way this weapon feels in my hands when firing it. Completely balanced, completely comfortable, and completely whole-heartedly accurate. This gun is being compared to the Glock for a reason gentleman. I’ve owned Glocks and they’re very reliable but I prefer the XD. There’s a reason this thing was handgun of the year for 2003 and 2004.

    Reply to Dominic
  59. Mike Kelly posted the following on September 15, 2006 at 9:25 pm.

    I have a Kimber target II and an ultra-carry, and a warthog. I am now thiinking about getting the xd 45 tactical (5 in) and the one thing that really bothered me
    about just holding it in my hand at the store, was the grip safety. If I could feel it just holdiing it at the store, and it bothered me, what is it going to feel like when
    alot of pressure is coming back into my palm?

    The grip safetys on a 1911 style are formed in such a way that I never notice them, not the case with the xd.

    I had bought a Glock 40 cal and brought it back, it felt uncomfortable in my hands and with the weather being cold, it hurt to fire…some of that could be that thte 40 cal is such a higher pressure round then a .45

    Id appreciate any comments on me buying the xd 45 5inch please be sent to
    ocean1955@sbcglobal.net

    Thanks

    Mike

    Reply to Mike Kelly
  60. HurraKane212 posted the following on September 14, 2006 at 8:39 pm.

    QUOTE* Jeff….no it is not….I am an Officer and you should not carry a charged weapon….you can charge within a second and ready to fire….think SAFETY…you already knew that though. I carry loaded, but not charged. *END QUOTE

    What utter rubbish. If you don’t have a round in the chamber then all you have is a rather unwieldy club. Of course you should have a round in the chamber! On the XD you have redundant safteys, the gun isn’t going to jump out and shoot soone on it’s own. Think of a situation where you might need to use a gun, do you really think that you can unholster the gun, rack the slide (requires both hands usually), and then aquire a sight picture and fire quick enough?
    It has been shown that inside 21 feet if an attacked has a knife and the victim has a gun holstered (with a round in the chamber), it is incredibly unlikley that the victim will be able to even get the gun into position before he is mortally wounded by the attacker with the knife.
    The ONLY time I could even concieve carrying without a round in the chamber is maybe if you pocket carried a GLOCK 26 and were VERY proficient with the Israeli Style draw.
    The fact that the MORON I quoted CLAIMS to be an officer means nothing. Even if he was an officer, most cops really don’t know much about guns and only shoot when they need to qualify (There are surely exceptions, but quite a few fit the aforementioned steriotype).
    This is the most important advice I can give to a gun newbie,
    GUNS ARE NOT SAFE
    THE ONLY REAL SAFTEY IS YOUR BRAIN!
    That said, remember the 4 rules of firearms saftey (google it if you don’t know)
    and keep your finger out of the trigger guard until you are ready to fire and yoiu should be ok.~Nathan

    Reply to HurraKane212
  61. ShineyRy posted the following on September 13, 2006 at 9:43 am.

    I’ve owned my XD-45 for a few months now, and could not possibly be happier. Had a Kimber gov’t 45, and thought I would regret losing the crisp trigger and inherent accuracy of that setup. Not at all. This thing is a tack-driver, and I can throw lots more bullets at the target before reloading. I’m going on 400 rounds w/o cleaning, and no problems. I can’t seem to find ammo this gun doesn’t like. I’ve never had a misfeed. Went to the range with a buddy who was ragging on me for buying a “plastic gun,” and shut him up when I put 14 rounds in a 3 inch square at 15 yards faster than he could unload his wheel-gun. I don’t have big hands, and Glocks always felt like I was holding a 2×4. This The gun points well, probably due to the fact that it shares the same grip angle as the 1911, so when you bring it to bear on the target, you are already aligned and ready to roll. It shoots very straight, has a nice trigger, and is more concealable, in my opinion, than my Kimber was. I’m just waiting for Springfield to do a sub-compact in 45 for my ankle rig, and I’ll be happy.

    Reply to ShineyRy
  62. ROGUE posted the following on September 4, 2006 at 12:35 am.

    SPRINGFIELD XD .45 IS TEST FIRED AND GOOD TO GO
    Accuracy I will give it a Grade A
    Fired 230 Grn Fiocci (Italy) without a hiccup right out of the box.
    Only (1) bad point and it isn’t bad.
    Watch the muzzle flip right off of the first bang.
    Can’t really call it flip though, it is more of a straight climb, the weapon will raise about 45 degrees up and you will be shooting over the berm on your second shot.
    However if you fight with it you can keep it about 10 degrees, maybe 15 degrees up and on the second and consecutive shots bring it down.
    This piece is really, really, really nice.
    Fired 14 rounds of the ACP is like butter once you learn how to control it.
    I would strongly recommend a two hand grip.
    I am more than happy that I bought this weapon it is now like maybe my most favorite gun of all I am thinking.
    Had my friend fire it but he is still thinking of the Smith and Wesson M and P and I am trying to convice him to go with the XD series because I like them so much and you really do get a heck of a lot for your money.

    Reply to ROGUE
  63. Brian F. posted the following on September 3, 2006 at 10:31 am.

    I recently purchased the XD9 sub and today shot my first competition pistol match using both it and my regular weapon. Prior to the match I had been discussing the 2 guns I brought with the RSO, and mentioned that I didn’t expect to shoot nearly as well with the XD as with my Sig, which I have carried and exercised for 10 years. After running both weapons through a full production pistol match, the RSO used my scores to validate the fact that my new weapon, with which I have very little experience, performed noticeably better than the one I have had for many years, carried in combat and put a great many rounds through. Maybe it was a quirk, but the trigger is great, and the hammerless SA first shot makes things very smooth and easy. No m/f’s so far after 400 or so rounds, and I have been very happy with it. Will probably buy the .40 as well if this gun continues to perform as well as it has so far as a leisure/range wepaon. No complaints whatsoever. I’m pretty impressed.

    Reply to Brian F.
  64. Brian posted the following on September 2, 2006 at 8:29 pm.

    Jeff….no it is not….I am an Officer and you should not carry a charged weapon….you can charge within a second and ready to fire….think SAFETY…you already knew that though. I carry loaded, but not charged.

    Reply to Brian
  65. Jeff posted the following on August 26, 2006 at 6:23 pm.

    I bought an XD40 sub-compact in July 2006. I have shot 500 rds through this weapon and have had no mal-functions whatsoever. I am new to CCW and pistols in general for that matter. But, I am retired military so I have been exposed to weapons for years. IS it common to carry your semi-auto with a round in the chamber?

    Reply to Jeff
  66. ROGUE posted the following on August 26, 2006 at 12:24 am.

    Just bought the XD.45 because I have had the XD .40 full size (not the tactical) for some time. I am also a huge Glock fan but the shootability and the reliability of my USED XD .40 is incredible. (bought it used but vg shape by someone who just didnt like it) The weapon fires even the cheapest ammo that will clog a Glock. Yep, hard to believe the XD is actually more reliable and cheaper than the Glock. Had a friend of mine shoot the XD and the first time he picked it up he was blasting all the rounds into the x ring at 25 yards unsupported.
    These weapons are awesome and I hope that my .45 is no exception. If it behaves exactly like the .40 then I will probably purchase the 9mm XD as well so that I have the whole series. Great to shoot and I am sure self defense fans will love the 45 chambering. I still do love my gLOCK BUT THERE IS plenty of room for the XD, and it is very well made as well.

    Reply to ROGUE
  67. Kevinc46205 posted the following on August 24, 2006 at 9:24 pm.

    I have just purchased an XD9 (my first pistol). Does anyone have any thoughts on high quality/low cost ammunition? Reloads are out of the question. Primary use is personal/home protection. Secondary use is range shooting. I think I would prefer FMJ, but could be talked into something else.

    Steve has already posted “I have had good results with Winchester and Hydro-Shock shells. Never under any circumstances fire Filoci (Fiocchi)… They do not hold the correct tolerances and it will jam every time.”

    Reply to Kevinc46205
  68. John713 posted the following on August 24, 2006 at 8:55 pm.

    I bought the XD 45 ACP Tactical this morning.We have been shooting one at the range that I work at for several weeks and have fired over 4500 rounds without cleaning it.We have only oiled it once and used mixed ammo,ball,hollow points and frangible.NO MALFUNCTIONS of any kind yet.I was very impressed with the way it felt in my hand and the price was great.

    Reply to John713
  69. pierre posted the following on August 22, 2006 at 3:45 am.

    I went to the gunstore to buy a Ruger .45 P90 or the special edition P90TH. I changed my mind when I held the two-tone XD-45. Light, compact, and it holds 13 rounds one in the hole. It also came with alot of accessories. Excellent pistol. If you don’t have one, trust me. Get one of the XD models!!!

    Reply to pierre
  70. Brian posted the following on August 19, 2006 at 8:07 pm.

    I have the XD .40 subcompact and LOVE it…………but I am having an extremely hard time finding a concealable small of back holster that will fit it…DOES ANY BODY HAVE ANY IDEAS????? Please help…I need one. THANKS

    Reply to Brian
  71. Mharms posted the following on August 19, 2006 at 4:36 am.

    I purchased the 5″ tactical model to carry when I go hunting out here in West Texas and to to carry in my truck when i am on the road. This is the first handgun that i have ever owned. It took me approximately 2 yrs to find the right gun. In it I have found for me the perfect pistol. I am currently in the USAF and have fired the M-9. I tried pretty much every model of handgun in this class and finally decided on this one. For me it was all about the fit and comfort since .40S&W was what i had chose for the caliber. round after round i have shot through this pistol so far no problems accurate reliable and comfortable to shoot. For me no finer pistol exist. I will stake my life and my families lives on it.\

    Reply to Mharms
  72. scripple posted the following on August 18, 2006 at 3:00 am.

    I love the XD-40. I use it as a CCW and practice with all of the time. Out of the box, it is the best that you can get….

    Reply to scripple
  73. CC Coleman posted the following on August 17, 2006 at 11:51 pm.

    I just bought the XD45 Service. Big gun and that was what I was going for. I beg to differ - the grip is a copy of the CZ75, not the 1911. It has less weight loaded than my CZ PCR 9mm. The trigger is telepathic - think about pulling it after you have shot conventional double actions for years and the shot is away. Will not need to push the slide in while reholstering to ensure it does not push out of battery. It points well and can make a can dance with instinct firing. This is my first polymer pistol as I am kind of a ludite and have been holding out for something other than the Glock. The Glock does not fit well and it does not do justice to the 45ACP in their rendering of it. The trigger is almost too smooth and light for me - wish they would come out with a NY Trigger or heavier trigger for us old 9mm Euro gun DA guys. I’ve noticed this gun is more forgiving to carry - that plastic is soft compared to metal to the skin or shirts or IWB carry. Wish the US Military would adopt a pistol like this rather than the HK after the Beretta has it’s run. Can’t wait to get a SC in this same caliber.

    Reply to CC Coleman
  74. b bid posted the following on August 13, 2006 at 5:15 am.

    i bought my xd 40 sub compact today didnt clean it and put 400 rounds through it not one jam or problem one hell of a gun

    Reply to b bid
  75. Mr. Roderick posted the following on August 1, 2006 at 7:35 pm.

    Does all extend mag come with the extend mag piece?

    Reply to Mr. Roderick
  76. Joey posted the following on July 24, 2006 at 12:24 am.

    I have been a *GLOCK* fan forever. As long as I can remember. I have owned the Glock 21. Glock 30, and now the Glock 27, Never a problem with any of them, and quite frankly the Glock 30 saved my life on a camping trip, but that story is for another forum. I walked into the local range the other day, and was inquiring to what is new and hot these days. Ummmmmm I guess I have been a little busy or under a rock. Kevin showed me a Springfield XD .40, and told me to go return some lead to the earth. I NOW AM 1 GLOCK SHORT IN MY COLLECTION….I traded my 27 on the spot….NIce case…Mag pouch x2 extended 2nd mag…What a wonderful tool Springfield has created. I live in Arizona so its shorts and sandals..Im not large as a man about 5ft 5 and thats pushing it…But with the right baggiee T-shirt I have carried the weapon for a month in a IWB holster..Only time I was busted was when *my wife caught me removing it before entering and establishment that served booze…My CCW permit was born to carry this gun…..I wont even go into how well the weapon shot…..Run dont walk to get yours……

    Reply to Joey
  77. james posted the following on July 18, 2006 at 3:21 am.

    bought a xd-40 two weeks ago, my son a marine stopped at my house when it was pouring down rain. he wanted to try the xd-40 out any way so we fired over 300 rds. through it without a single malfuncion and i mean it was pouring down. i was in the army in nam in 68 and seen monsoon rains and this rain equaled it!we shot the cheapest ammo we could fine, american eagle and umc brands. i also bought a smith and wesson 40 mp but cant get it yet because of the law but as soon as i get it i am going to compare it to the xd-40!

    Reply to james
  78. MAJ Ron C. Todd Jr. posted the following on July 9, 2006 at 4:45 am.

    Just bought an XD-40 and took it out to the range. Loved it. Very comfortable and easy to fire. Even had my son try it out and he’s never fired a weapon before and he was center of mass about 60% of the time. Highly recommend it as an option.

    Reply to MAJ Ron C. Todd Jr.
  79. Jeff Williams posted the following on July 6, 2006 at 1:23 am.

    I’ve owned Kimber,glock and colt defender subcompacts.I’ve got a Les Baer Commanche and love it.A friend told me to get the XD.Damn! Throw the Glock out,heave the Defender,and ditch the Kimber. cause this gun feels great in your hand and does it shoot!Where have I been,this thing is fun to shoot.Put the Streamlight TLR-2 on it and what a gun.I’m impressed.

    Reply to Jeff Williams
  80. Will posted the following on July 3, 2006 at 4:32 am.

    I recently traded a SW40VE for the XD.40, and I love it. It has a little stronger recoil, but the gun is so balanced that it don’t matter.

    Reply to Will
  81. Michael posted the following on June 1, 2006 at 7:56 pm.

    I have been a huge Glock fan, and own more than I actually “need”, but guns are like that.
    I bought one of the new XD .45ACP Service models, and was so impressed with it that I went back and bought a .40 Subcompact. I have been carrying a Glock 27 for several years, but I find that that I prefer the Springfield Sub. It feels better in the hand, and shoots great. The felt recoil actually seems milder with the Springfield than the Glock. Add the enhanced safety features of the XD, and I am now a convert to the Springfield side of the Force.
    For concealed carry you can do a lot worse that the XD Sub, but you can’t do much better.
    (And after 200 rounds with no cleaning, no malfunctions of any sort with five different types of ammo.)

    Reply to Michael
  82. Jason posted the following on May 31, 2006 at 11:24 pm.

    gun show had it for 530 with light and 9 rounder and 12 rounder and speedloader and holster for gun and magazines

    Reply to Jason
  83. Jason posted the following on May 31, 2006 at 11:23 pm.

    I have the XD40 Subcompact and it is great! I have only done 100 rounds of winchester and no jams, i carry it with hydro shocks though! Still trying to get the right size in the waist holster for it, i guess thats what happens when you order off the internet