Anyone fired this beauty? Springfield Armory XD Sub Compact .40 S&W
Thursday, 9 February 2006 | 26,046 readers so far
I think I’m going to buy one of these when I get home. Anyone have any practical experience with Springfield Armory weapons? I have a Glock 23 already and I’m really quite taken with the .40 S&W round. This pistol just looks fun to shoot. I should be able to get one for $400. Maybe $650 by the time I get done with accessories.
1 February 10th, 2006 at 6:54 am
Kitanis says:
I shot the predecessor to the XD-9, the HS2000. I prefer this weapon to Glocks because for me its a more balanced pistol in my hand.
I want to purchase the XD-40 myself.
2 February 10th, 2006 at 6:14 pm
the will to exist - a blog about life » Or perhaps I should purchase a Taurus PT 24/7 says:
[...] The PT 24/7 PRO PISTOL is a possible alternative to the SA XD40 pistol I blogged yesterday. This pistol is loudly advertised by Taurus as a Single Action Double Action! They should pay for better copy editing though. The grammar is horrible. Of course, they’re Brazilian so it could be an issue with native language versus English skills. [...]
3 February 18th, 2006 at 2:12 am
Steve says:
I have a XD-40 Service model and love it. When I was shooting on a consistently, I could unload the clip as fast as I could pull the trigger at 25 yards, 8 shots were center chest and 2 were shoulder. The gun is picky on the ammo it like to shoot. I have had good results with Winchester and Hydro-Shock shells. Never under any circumstances fire Filoci, I hope I spelled it correctly, shells. They do not hold the correct tolerances and it will jam every time. A mistake that could cost someone their like in a bad time and place. I recommend what every you buy, pick the most accurate / trouble free ammo. Because if it clicks while you are defending yourself, family, etc…. it turns into the most expensive rock you have ever bought.
Other than that, happy shooting, be safe and have fun!
4 March 1st, 2006 at 5:10 am
Michael says:
I go to old car shows and sometimes carry large amounts of cash. I’ve been thinking about purchasing a Springfield Armory XD .40 sub compact for concealed carry. A aqquaintance of mine says Springfield Armory pistols are known to jam more then the other american made pistols, except for maybe Smith&wesson. It’s funny he says that and doesnt own one altough. Are the XD Springfield’s as good as glocks in terms of reliability?
5 March 1st, 2006 at 10:47 am
Trevor says:
Michael,
I haven’t (yet) owned a Springfield Armory weapon, but I can say that others seem to find their SA weapons reliable:
It’s very likely I’ll purchase one of their .40 caliber weapons when I return from Iraq to the U.S. I will then report further (later this year).
Springfield Armory has been around a long time as a name, but it changed ownership in 1976.
6 March 4th, 2006 at 5:55 am
Chuck Barton says:
Bought my XD40 subcompact yesterday evening and headed to the range. Shot the X-ring out of two targets at 25 ft right out of the box with UMC factory jacketed. 3rd box were FMJ reloads. No malfunctions but the spread was a mite bigger. Just need to find a grip extension for the 9-round mag and I’ll be a very happy camper.
7 March 4th, 2006 at 3:47 pm
Trevor says:
Thanks much for your feedback Mr. Barton. I certainly appreciate it.
8 March 13th, 2006 at 8:24 pm
john says:
I own that gun without the taclite, in 9mm. The trigger is a jewel as you can draw back on it and hold target, then fire, double tap, etc. without having to cycle the entire length of the trigger pull. The point where the trigger will fire the round is very distintive but not heavy at all. It will tuck behind the hip without a holster and stay there, at least for me. i can also slip it into my pant front pocket. the gun is very reliable in 9mm and so fun to shoot. double taps are easy and meet the criteria of having “rounds on target”. Good luck.
9 March 14th, 2006 at 1:32 pm
Trevor says:
Thanks for your feedback John. I really appreciate it. I don’t have any comparable feedback on the Taurus, but I’m leaning towards the Springfield right now. It sounds like a well built weapon that’s fun, accurate and well engineered. I do much prefer the .40 cal though.
10 March 21st, 2006 at 8:06 pm
James says:
I bought an XD40 back in October and I have fired probably close to 1,000 rounds through it with Winchester 165’s FMJ and Remington 180 HP’s through it and I have never had a malfunction yet. It took some getting used to but now I can hold a 20 oz. pop bottle at 20 yds.
11 March 28th, 2006 at 1:40 am
Jake Mank says:
I bought myself a Glock 27 for concealed carry, but it was uncomfortable for 8 hours of daily wear. I bought myself a small .357 revolver for concealed carry and traded the Glock 27 (.40) for a Springfield Armory XD-40. I regreted it so much. After two weeks of owning the Springfield and having consistent failures-to-feed when activating the slide release, when charging, and while shooting I went back to the gun store. I told them my experiences with the Springfield, to which they were amazed, and traded it in for a Glock 23. Never have I experienced as much malfunctions with a gun as I did with that Springfield. I had zero malfunctions with my G27, and am looking forward to shooting my new G23.
12 March 30th, 2006 at 11:21 pm
Jose C Jimenez says:
I fired my brand new XD sub compact .40 last sunday. Last time I fired a weapon was 20 years ago in the ARMY. I was expecting to shoot terribly. I use to shoot a .45(1911) and m-16, so was expecting to miss by a LOT. To my surprise I hit straight in the middle, more than that, I tore the center of the card! I didnt believe my eyes. This gun is heavy and stable. My brother was firing a Glock 22, wish seeems lighter despite the size (he is a Cop) and I fired better than him! I told him the gun must have aim and shoot itself, lol, THAT GOOD IT IS! ( I got to give HER a name do…) lol
13 April 4th, 2006 at 9:22 am
dawg says:
if any of you are serious check out the latest guns and ammo and see how the xd stood up to a more sever torture test than the glock is given, i love my xd-40
14 April 6th, 2006 at 4:38 am
Dale Cauthen says:
I bought the 4″ XD in 9 just for IPSC and IDPA. Took about 300 rounds to get it broken in, no jams after that and it regularly gets 200 rounds put through it on match days between the 100-150 I’ll shoot in the match and another 100 or so plinking afterward and letting people try it. Bought the 5″ Tactical to see if it would shoot better but I keep it in the bag for a spare. That duty model is just too good to believe. I’m buying the 4″ XD in 40 this weekend.
15 April 7th, 2006 at 6:27 pm
jeff says:
I’ve fired every caliber of XD at my local range and had outstanding results with all of them. Especially the 9mm and the .45 ACP. The grip angle is the same as the 1911 and much more natural for me than any Glock. The safety features are unobtrusive and work very well. I have noticed that in every discussion forum I look at there is only one bad review. Maybe there’s something to those, but after putting hundreds of rounds through rental beaters at the range I’m satisfed that the XDs are supremely durable and accurate. I plan on buying the XD 9mm sub compact w/ the high capacity mag as well as the 4″ .45 ACP that just came out. The new .45 ACP holds 14 rounds and is the same size grip as the 9mm! It is the smoothest .45 I’ve tried.
16 April 9th, 2006 at 10:23 am
Derek Monroe says:
I bought one about 8 months and love the heck out of it. my accuracy increased easily(i’m recreational), 3 of my buddies also had great comments about it. I love it; great investment. also have a ruger p89t special edition(1st pistol). Mine came with the XML(light), belt holster, 2 stainless 9 round clips and 1 XD gear extended mag that is 15 cap., and of course case, lock, brush…. Love it. I am certified concealed also.
17 April 9th, 2006 at 10:28 am
Derek Monroe says:
i just bragged on my xd40, i have never shot a glock my cop buddy hs a couple, but a majority of police departments sre switching the XD series..their saying is “The Future of Handguns”, sorry just pround of mine, i actualy have both my pistols next to me because i was going to check them out, since they pretty much stay in safe. I don’t think you’ll be dissappointed
18 April 9th, 2006 at 10:32 am
Derek Monroe says:
sorry one more thing:i payed under 600 for XD40, 2 stainless 9 round clips, 1 XD Gear Extended Mag 12 rounds, XML light which is $100 by itself. case, lock. It is also the worlds smallest carry pistol.
19 April 12th, 2006 at 9:22 am
Randall says:
I just bought the XD 45 ACP today and am far from impressed. The accuracy was dead on, but it jammed several times. This may have been a faulty mag, but that’s no excuse for 8 jams out of only 100 rounds from a brand new pistol (and yes I cleaned it before shooting). Also, the handle is way too long; it felt fine in the store, but not when shooting. Finally, the extractor seems impossible to clean unless you tear down the pistol past what the warranty allows. I’m gonna trade it for a Glock 30 tomorrow morning. Been using a Glock 27 for a while now without any complaints.
20 April 13th, 2006 at 2:33 pm
Jose C Jimenez says:
Randall, while in the Armory, give the .40 version a try. I was going for the .45 but was advise against it, not because the gun, but the .45 ACP round itself.
21 April 17th, 2006 at 8:26 pm
Domonic says:
XD 9mm is a great allaround handgun!
I love the balance and the sights.
I have shot over 2000 rounds and no jams.
While at the range my shooting partner droped it in the mud (unloaded) and with a quick visual wipe down it shot over 200 rounds. That got my to get some balls and I submirged it in mud water loaded and it shot another 100 rounds with no problems!
22 April 20th, 2006 at 12:39 am
Michael says:
I have shot the .40 service model and loved it. I shot the .40 sub compact today and liked it more. The people that say bad things about this gun must have problems or are using some kind of crappy reloads. I have never heard of a problem with one of these untill this blog. Buy one. I plan on it.
23 April 21st, 2006 at 8:48 am
joey says:
i have a springfield xd-9mm subcompact. this is the most comfortable handgun around. so far i have no jams to report at the range (over 5000 rounds). great gun overall.
24 April 26th, 2006 at 2:30 am
Travis says:
I recently was in the market for a new gun. I wanted a reliable, easy to maintain, straight shooter. I found that in the XD-40. I also liked the fact that I could drop a 9mm barrel in it. Honestly, besides being a great gun, (Much better than a glock IMO, mainly because of the grip, trigger, and grip safety) one reason to consider the XD is that its following is growing by leaps and bounds. I was just at my local shop when I picked mine up and they told me that the XD’s are out selling the glocks 2 to 1. This means that there will be more aftermarket products for them then the Taurus.
Point: buy the XD, its cheap and great!
25 April 27th, 2006 at 6:44 am
James says:
hey y’all,
i have owned my XD-40 for about six months. i have the service model. and i love it. it is the only firearm i own that i would trust to save my life, in that situation. i have put lots of hundreds of rounds through it and it is the best. got the whole package (3 mags, kydex holster, tac light, lock, case, and brush for under 600.00!!!! i was pleased and colse it over the glock for one reason. saftey features. the grip saftey, like the 1911 is the best idea on a plastic handgun i have ever seen. got kids, need saftey. but the gun safe it is in. i would not trade for anything.
–KowBoY
26 April 28th, 2006 at 6:24 pm
Jose C Jimenez says:
Best gun ever, mine came without the tac light, anyone got a spare one cheap?
27 April 30th, 2006 at 10:22 pm
Jonathan says:
regardless of which department’s move to any particular type of gun other than Glock, we will always have the suspect outnumbered. Lastly, I have to say… “I’m gonna bet my life on any gun, it has to be a Glcok”.
28 May 5th, 2006 at 1:41 am
Erich says:
I have the .40SW 4″ service model and love it. I’m picking up a .40SW 3″ SC for a BUG. I’m planning to use them for duty weapons when I become a cop.
One note, in some places the 3″ .40’s are really hard to find, so if you see one and think you want it, I suggest you jump on it. I’ve been on a waiting list for months. If you want more info on these, check out http://www.hs2000talk.com/ or http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/index.php
29 May 5th, 2006 at 6:34 pm
jake says:
i have this gun in a 9mm it has less recoil than the Glock 26
and it doesent beat you to death to shoot.. it accepts larger factory 16 round mags also
30 May 5th, 2006 at 6:36 pm
jake says:
extended mag
31 May 5th, 2006 at 6:38 pm
jake says:
extended mag
http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j105/jake1911/aandggrip.jpg
32 May 19th, 2006 at 8:41 am
fenris says:
I have a service model xd 40 and like it so much I just got the sub-c xd 9mm! You won’t be disappointed with these guns they are the best. The mags are interchangeable and I can put about 17 rounds of 9mm in the 40mags! With the pierce grip plate for the sub 9 it fits in the hand nice and it’s so small!! These are great guns. I have a Glock 21 also but I’ve never had a problem with the XD and have fired about 1000 rds throught the 40 w/out a single jam!!
33 May 22nd, 2006 at 4:10 pm
Fiveocommando says:
I have carried a Springfield XD9 subcompact as an off-duty and plain clothes weapon for the past two years. I have put several hundred rounds of varying types of ammunition through it in this time. I have had only a single malfunction in this time and it was related to a bad magazine. These guns are very reliable, rugged, and accurate. I wouldn’t carry anything that I didn’t feel 100% confident in since my life depends on it. On a personal note, I saw that someone recommended a Taurus PT series gun. I had a PT-111 9mm a few year back that I purhased with the intention of using as a off-duty and plain clothes duty weapon. The front sight fell off the gun, the feed ramp had a burr on it, the magazines rattled when loaded, and the gun would only shoot ball ammunition!! Needless to say I didn’t keep that gun very long!!
34 May 22nd, 2006 at 5:34 pm
Trevor says:
Thanks fiveocommando, and everyone else. I’ve definitely decided on the SA XD 40 as my next purchase.
35 May 22nd, 2006 at 7:34 pm
Jose C Jimenez says:
GOOD CHOICE Trevor! Way to go…AIRBORNE!
36 May 24th, 2006 at 8:28 am
Mort says:
Hey all, I recieved my SA XD-40 4″ about 2 weeks ago. Brought her home, give her a quick cleaning and took her out on a date! I put close to 50 rds. through her just to break her in,.. But I know she was begging for more. She was flawless!!
The next weekend I went out to see what she’s got for accuracy. Using a pistol bench rest and an Official NRA 50ft. Timed And Rapid Fire Pistol Target. With the above being said, you should know the distance to the target (50′)! Just because I and a lot of my hand guns enjoy Speer Gold Dot Ammo, I went with that! .40 S&W 180gr. Gold Dots! Long story short…..SUPERB!!! CONSISTENTLY hitting 8,9,10, rings!!! Of course there were hits on the 6 and 7 rings, but that was my fault!
This is a pistol that is and has revolutionized the polymer handgun industry. GET ONE! You’ll thank yourself.
37 May 30th, 2006 at 8:34 pm
Bart Stevens says:
I purchased an XD-40 sub-compact two days ago. Without cleaning the gun first, I took it to the range and put 400 rounds through it. I had no malfunctions or problems of any kind. I put some cheaper Winchester and Federal ammo through it (ball, not HP). I also put ten rounds of the Corbon self-defence loads (HP) through it. It handled all ammo without a problem. The only thing I had to do was adjust the rear sight. The pistol was shooting left and looking at the rear sight it was obviously not centered on the gun. Easily adjusted (with the proper tool), after which it shot very well for a short barreled pistol. So far I am very pleased with this gun, and so far it has not had any malfunctions. I find it interesting that there are some people who swear by one brand of gun only. I have owned many different brands that have been completely reliable and some brands that have not. Saying that only one brand of firearm is good is a bit silly, or the individual is just ignorant of other brands but feels obligated to promote the only brand he owns (being negative about others). Also, what fits one persons hand doesn’t necessarily fit everyone. I will admit that there are some brands out there that I would not use for self-defence because I don’t trust them to always work. I have found quality and reliability in Glocks (don’t fit my hand well, but an excellent brand), and Sigs (very good line of guns, but I don’t have any experience with their new polymer line). I would trust my life using the Sig’s and Glocks that I have owned and own now. I found the small Tarus pistols (PT111 and the .40) to be not as reliable (occasional mis-feeds) as the Glocks and Sigs that I have owned. As in cars, I also believe that you can get a lemon no matter what brand you buy. It is unlikely to happen in the higher quality brands, but it can happen (even to Glocks, I have seen a bad one!). There are some brands (HK, etc..) out there that I have heard are very reliable, but I haven’t had any experence with them. The fact that I have not had experence with them doesn’t make them bad or not as good as the brands that I have owned. It just means that I don’t know, and it would be stupid for me to say anything positive or negetive about them. For the “.45 (1911)only fans”, I have an old 1911 that I love to shoot, but being 5′ 7″ and 160 lbs., it is impossible for me to carry concealed on my body except during the coldest winter days. I live in normally hot weather year round so I need a small light pistol. So far I am impressed with the quality and reliability of this XD-40 sub-compact. Lets see if I can hide this thing on my small body when the temps hit the upper 90s and 100s. I may have to hide the gun in my day-planner like I do the larger guns. Wear a fanny-pack in this part of Texas and I will stand out terribly. I can get away with a day-planner without drawing attention, but not a fanny pack. I bought this gun to hide on my person during the summer. We shall see.
38 May 31st, 2006 at 11:23 pm
Jason says:
I have the XD40 Subcompact and it is great! I have only done 100 rounds of winchester and no jams, i carry it with hydro shocks though! Still trying to get the right size in the waist holster for it, i guess thats what happens when you order off the internet
39 May 31st, 2006 at 11:24 pm
Jason says:
gun show had it for 530 with light and 9 rounder and 12 rounder and speedloader and holster for gun and magazines
40 June 1st, 2006 at 7:56 pm
Michael says:
I have been a huge Glock fan, and own more than I actually “need”, but guns are like that.
I bought one of the new XD .45ACP Service models, and was so impressed with it that I went back and bought a .40 Subcompact. I have been carrying a Glock 27 for several years, but I find that that I prefer the Springfield Sub. It feels better in the hand, and shoots great. The felt recoil actually seems milder with the Springfield than the Glock. Add the enhanced safety features of the XD, and I am now a convert to the Springfield side of the Force.
For concealed carry you can do a lot worse that the XD Sub, but you can’t do much better.
(And after 200 rounds with no cleaning, no malfunctions of any sort with five different types of ammo.)
41 July 3rd, 2006 at 4:32 am
Will says:
I recently traded a SW40VE for the XD.40, and I love it. It has a little stronger recoil, but the gun is so balanced that it don’t matter.
42 July 6th, 2006 at 1:23 am
Jeff Williams says:
I’ve owned Kimber,glock and colt defender subcompacts.I’ve got a Les Baer Commanche and love it.A friend told me to get the XD.Damn! Throw the Glock out,heave the Defender,and ditch the Kimber. cause this gun feels great in your hand and does it shoot!Where have I been,this thing is fun to shoot.Put the Streamlight TLR-2 on it and what a gun.I’m impressed.
43 July 9th, 2006 at 4:45 am
MAJ Ron C. Todd Jr. says:
Just bought an XD-40 and took it out to the range. Loved it. Very comfortable and easy to fire. Even had my son try it out and he’s never fired a weapon before and he was center of mass about 60% of the time. Highly recommend it as an option.
44 July 18th, 2006 at 3:21 am
james says:
bought a xd-40 two weeks ago, my son a marine stopped at my house when it was pouring down rain. he wanted to try the xd-40 out any way so we fired over 300 rds. through it without a single malfuncion and i mean it was pouring down. i was in the army in nam in 68 and seen monsoon rains and this rain equaled it!we shot the cheapest ammo we could fine, american eagle and umc brands. i also bought a smith and wesson 40 mp but cant get it yet because of the law but as soon as i get it i am going to compare it to the xd-40!
45 July 24th, 2006 at 12:24 am
Joey says:
I have been a *GLOCK* fan forever. As long as I can remember. I have owned the Glock 21. Glock 30, and now the Glock 27, Never a problem with any of them, and quite frankly the Glock 30 saved my life on a camping trip, but that story is for another forum. I walked into the local range the other day, and was inquiring to what is new and hot these days. Ummmmmm I guess I have been a little busy or under a rock. Kevin showed me a Springfield XD .40, and told me to go return some lead to the earth. I NOW AM 1 GLOCK SHORT IN MY COLLECTION….I traded my 27 on the spot….NIce case…Mag pouch x2 extended 2nd mag…What a wonderful tool Springfield has created. I live in Arizona so its shorts and sandals..Im not large as a man about 5ft 5 and thats pushing it…But with the right baggiee T-shirt I have carried the weapon for a month in a IWB holster..Only time I was busted was when *my wife caught me removing it before entering and establishment that served booze…My CCW permit was born to carry this gun…..I wont even go into how well the weapon shot…..Run dont walk to get yours……
46 August 1st, 2006 at 7:35 pm
Mr. Roderick says:
Does all extend mag come with the extend mag piece?
47 August 13th, 2006 at 5:15 am
b bid says:
i bought my xd 40 sub compact today didnt clean it and put 400 rounds through it not one jam or problem one hell of a gun
48 August 17th, 2006 at 11:51 pm
CC Coleman says:
I just bought the XD45 Service. Big gun and that was what I was going for. I beg to differ - the grip is a copy of the CZ75, not the 1911. It has less weight loaded than my CZ PCR 9mm. The trigger is telepathic - think about pulling it after you have shot conventional double actions for years and the shot is away. Will not need to push the slide in while reholstering to ensure it does not push out of battery. It points well and can make a can dance with instinct firing. This is my first polymer pistol as I am kind of a ludite and have been holding out for something other than the Glock. The Glock does not fit well and it does not do justice to the 45ACP in their rendering of it. The trigger is almost too smooth and light for me - wish they would come out with a NY Trigger or heavier trigger for us old 9mm Euro gun DA guys. I’ve noticed this gun is more forgiving to carry - that plastic is soft compared to metal to the skin or shirts or IWB carry. Wish the US Military would adopt a pistol like this rather than the HK after the Beretta has it’s run. Can’t wait to get a SC in this same caliber.
49 August 18th, 2006 at 3:00 am
scripple says:
I love the XD-40. I use it as a CCW and practice with all of the time. Out of the box, it is the best that you can get….
50 August 19th, 2006 at 4:36 am
Mharms says:
I purchased the 5″ tactical model to carry when I go hunting out here in West Texas and to to carry in my truck when i am on the road. This is the first handgun that i have ever owned. It took me approximately 2 yrs to find the right gun. In it I have found for me the perfect pistol. I am currently in the USAF and have fired the M-9. I tried pretty much every model of handgun in this class and finally decided on this one. For me it was all about the fit and comfort since .40S&W was what i had chose for the caliber. round after round i have shot through this pistol so far no problems accurate reliable and comfortable to shoot. For me no finer pistol exist. I will stake my life and my families lives on it.\
51 August 19th, 2006 at 8:07 pm
Brian says:
I have the XD .40 subcompact and LOVE it…………but I am having an extremely hard time finding a concealable small of back holster that will fit it…DOES ANY BODY HAVE ANY IDEAS????? Please help…I need one. THANKS
52 August 22nd, 2006 at 3:45 am
pierre says:
I went to the gunstore to buy a Ruger .45 P90 or the special edition P90TH. I changed my mind when I held the two-tone XD-45. Light, compact, and it holds 13 rounds one in the hole. It also came with alot of accessories. Excellent pistol. If you don’t have one, trust me. Get one of the XD models!!!
53 August 24th, 2006 at 8:55 pm
John713 says:
I bought the XD 45 ACP Tactical this morning.We have been shooting one at the range that I work at for several weeks and have fired over 4500 rounds without cleaning it.We have only oiled it once and used mixed ammo,ball,hollow points and frangible.NO MALFUNCTIONS of any kind yet.I was very impressed with the way it felt in my hand and the price was great.
54 August 24th, 2006 at 9:24 pm
Kevinc46205 says:
I have just purchased an XD9 (my first pistol). Does anyone have any thoughts on high quality/low cost ammunition? Reloads are out of the question. Primary use is personal/home protection. Secondary use is range shooting. I think I would prefer FMJ, but could be talked into something else.
Steve has already posted “I have had good results with Winchester and Hydro-Shock shells. Never under any circumstances fire Filoci (Fiocchi)… They do not hold the correct tolerances and it will jam every time.”
55 August 26th, 2006 at 12:24 am
ROGUE says:
Just bought the XD.45 because I have had the XD .40 full size (not the tactical) for some time. I am also a huge Glock fan but the shootability and the reliability of my USED XD .40 is incredible. (bought it used but vg shape by someone who just didnt like it) The weapon fires even the cheapest ammo that will clog a Glock. Yep, hard to believe the XD is actually more reliable and cheaper than the Glock. Had a friend of mine shoot the XD and the first time he picked it up he was blasting all the rounds into the x ring at 25 yards unsupported.
These weapons are awesome and I hope that my .45 is no exception. If it behaves exactly like the .40 then I will probably purchase the 9mm XD as well so that I have the whole series. Great to shoot and I am sure self defense fans will love the 45 chambering. I still do love my gLOCK BUT THERE IS plenty of room for the XD, and it is very well made as well.
56 August 26th, 2006 at 6:23 pm
Jeff says:
I bought an XD40 sub-compact in July 2006. I have shot 500 rds through this weapon and have had no mal-functions whatsoever. I am new to CCW and pistols in general for that matter. But, I am retired military so I have been exposed to weapons for years. IS it common to carry your semi-auto with a round in the chamber?
57 September 2nd, 2006 at 8:29 pm
Brian says:
Jeff….no it is not….I am an Officer and you should not carry a charged weapon….you can charge within a second and ready to fire….think SAFETY…you already knew that though. I carry loaded, but not charged.
58 September 3rd, 2006 at 10:31 am
Brian F. says:
I recently purchased the XD9 sub and today shot my first competition pistol match using both it and my regular weapon. Prior to the match I had been discussing the 2 guns I brought with the RSO, and mentioned that I didn’t expect to shoot nearly as well with the XD as with my Sig, which I have carried and exercised for 10 years. After running both weapons through a full production pistol match, the RSO used my scores to validate the fact that my new weapon, with which I have very little experience, performed noticeably better than the one I have had for many years, carried in combat and put a great many rounds through. Maybe it was a quirk, but the trigger is great, and the hammerless SA first shot makes things very smooth and easy. No m/f’s so far after 400 or so rounds, and I have been very happy with it. Will probably buy the .40 as well if this gun continues to perform as well as it has so far as a leisure/range wepaon. No complaints whatsoever. I’m pretty impressed.
59 September 4th, 2006 at 12:35 am
ROGUE says:
SPRINGFIELD XD .45 IS TEST FIRED AND GOOD TO GO
Accuracy I will give it a Grade A
Fired 230 Grn Fiocci (Italy) without a hiccup right out of the box.
Only (1) bad point and it isn’t bad.
Watch the muzzle flip right off of the first bang.
Can’t really call it flip though, it is more of a straight climb, the weapon will raise about 45 degrees up and you will be shooting over the berm on your second shot.
However if you fight with it you can keep it about 10 degrees, maybe 15 degrees up and on the second and consecutive shots bring it down.
This piece is really, really, really nice.
Fired 14 rounds of the ACP is like butter once you learn how to control it.
I would strongly recommend a two hand grip.
I am more than happy that I bought this weapon it is now like maybe my most favorite gun of all I am thinking.
Had my friend fire it but he is still thinking of the Smith and Wesson M and P and I am trying to convice him to go with the XD series because I like them so much and you really do get a heck of a lot for your money.
60 September 13th, 2006 at 9:43 am
ShineyRy says:
I’ve owned my XD-45 for a few months now, and could not possibly be happier. Had a Kimber gov’t 45, and thought I would regret losing the crisp trigger and inherent accuracy of that setup. Not at all. This thing is a tack-driver, and I can throw lots more bullets at the target before reloading. I’m going on 400 rounds w/o cleaning, and no problems. I can’t seem to find ammo this gun doesn’t like. I’ve never had a misfeed. Went to the range with a buddy who was ragging on me for buying a “plastic gun,” and shut him up when I put 14 rounds in a 3 inch square at 15 yards faster than he could unload his wheel-gun. I don’t have big hands, and Glocks always felt like I was holding a 2×4. This The gun points well, probably due to the fact that it shares the same grip angle as the 1911, so when you bring it to bear on the target, you are already aligned and ready to roll. It shoots very straight, has a nice trigger, and is more concealable, in my opinion, than my Kimber was. I’m just waiting for Springfield to do a sub-compact in 45 for my ankle rig, and I’ll be happy.
61 September 14th, 2006 at 8:39 pm
HurraKane212 says:
QUOTE* Jeff….no it is not….I am an Officer and you should not carry a charged weapon….you can charge within a second and ready to fire….think SAFETY…you already knew that though. I carry loaded, but not charged. *END QUOTE
What utter rubbish. If you don’t have a round in the chamber then all you have is a rather unwieldy club. Of course you should have a round in the chamber! On the XD you have redundant safteys, the gun isn’t going to jump out and shoot soone on it’s own. Think of a situation where you might need to use a gun, do you really think that you can unholster the gun, rack the slide (requires both hands usually), and then aquire a sight picture and fire quick enough?
It has been shown that inside 21 feet if an attacked has a knife and the victim has a gun holstered (with a round in the chamber), it is incredibly unlikley that the victim will be able to even get the gun into position before he is mortally wounded by the attacker with the knife.
The ONLY time I could even concieve carrying without a round in the chamber is maybe if you pocket carried a GLOCK 26 and were VERY proficient with the Israeli Style draw.
The fact that the MORON I quoted CLAIMS to be an officer means nothing. Even if he was an officer, most cops really don’t know much about guns and only shoot when they need to qualify (There are surely exceptions, but quite a few fit the aforementioned steriotype).
This is the most important advice I can give to a gun newbie,
GUNS ARE NOT SAFE
THE ONLY REAL SAFTEY IS YOUR BRAIN!
That said, remember the 4 rules of firearms saftey (google it if you don’t know)
and keep your finger out of the trigger guard until you are ready to fire and yoiu should be ok.~Nathan
62 September 15th, 2006 at 9:25 pm
Mike Kelly says:
I have a Kimber target II and an ultra-carry, and a warthog. I am now thiinking about getting the xd 45 tactical (5 in) and the one thing that really bothered me
about just holding it in my hand at the store, was the grip safety. If I could feel it just holdiing it at the store, and it bothered me, what is it going to feel like when
alot of pressure is coming back into my palm?
The grip safetys on a 1911 style are formed in such a way that I never notice them, not the case with the xd.
I had bought a Glock 40 cal and brought it back, it felt uncomfortable in my hands and with the weather being cold, it hurt to fire…some of that could be that thte 40 cal is such a higher pressure round then a .45
Id appreciate any comments on me buying the xd 45 5inch please be sent to
ocean1955@sbcglobal.net
Thanks
Mike
63 September 25th, 2006 at 5:34 am
Dominic says:
I have owned my XD-40 for a little over a year now and I absolutely love it. I just cleaned it for the first time a few days ago and have never had any problems with it. It did end up jamming one time when I attempted to shoot some of my cousins PCI rounds out of it. I’ve found that this weapon really prefers steel jacketed Wolf rounds, Hydra-shock Federal, Safety slugs, and reloads where there is no indentation between the bullet and the casing. It has to be smooth all the way down fellas. Aside from its slightly touchy attitude towards ammo I love my XD. In fact, I love it so much when I move to Arizona and join the police department, I’m going to ask if I can use an XD for carrying. Furthermore I love the way this weapon feels in my hands when firing it. Completely balanced, completely comfortable, and completely whole-heartedly accurate. This gun is being compared to the Glock for a reason gentleman. I’ve owned Glocks and they’re very reliable but I prefer the XD. There’s a reason this thing was handgun of the year for 2003 and 2004.
64 September 25th, 2006 at 5:50 am
Dominic says:
Oh and I almost forgot, some of you who are really amped about the .40 S&W calibers but aren’t too hip to the .45 ACP chambering, I’d like for you to remember that Springfield has just recently created an XD pistol with the new Glock chambered .45 round. It’s the Springfield XD .45 GAP, which I haven’t shot yet but would really like to. I’ve read all the reviews and its a far easier load to control than that of your typical .45 ACP.
65 October 2nd, 2006 at 10:11 am
Jess aumiller says:
Have put 800 rounds in my new SpringField XD9 service and have had zero issues.
It’s the Glock on Crack! I love it as my all in one sidearm.
I have shot and own alot of hand guns, Walther, Sig, Glock, Colt, Ruger and my favorite to date is the XD. They took what works from other guns and put it all into one….
66 October 10th, 2006 at 5:06 am
Sgt_rock says:
Just shot my XD-40 Service Model (4″ barrel) for the first time yesterday - fantastic side arm! I was concerned about moving away from my BHP .40 to a ‘plastic gun’ because of the trigger. I never took to the glock trigger or the over all feel of them. The XD-40 is distinicly different from the glock and the trigger is great. Mine only has 150 rounds throught it, but so far I’m pleased.
67 October 11th, 2006 at 7:21 am
Jay says:
I am currently deciding between the sub-compact XD .40 and 9mm. Having tried them both out at my local range I am leaning towards the 9mm.
The .40 rental gun jammed on me about 4 to 5 times during 50 rounds. No problems with the 9mm. Granted it just probably needed a clean, but from what I have read the .40 XD is less reliable, and perhaps .40 ammo is less accurate in general.
For me the sub-compact will be my first carry pistol, as I have signed up for a CCW class.
I am far more accurate shooting a 1911, even compact 1911’s, but due to the weight I lose that edge after shooting for a while.
It appears that most of the people posting here prefer the .40. Can someone post why they prefer this for personal defense.
Thanks,
Jay.
68 October 30th, 2006 at 10:48 pm
James says:
Kevinc46205 asked about ammo for personal/home protection and range shooting. My opinion is that you should not use FMJ for personal/home protection. It is fine for practice. However, if you NEED to stop an attacker, the bullet must expand and not pass through the criminal. I have an XD-45 and the retired police officer at the gun shoppe recommended Hornady JHP/XTP for defense. The Federal HydraShock is also a good defense round according to a conceal carry instructor I know. I have fired this round a few times and saw the expansion, it was impressive. I have not fired any Hornady yet, but I will next time I practice. A quality weapon is only part of the equation; quality ammo is the other part — it is probably more importaint. When it comes to protecting your loved ones and yourself, $25.00 for 50 rounds of ammo that will put down an attacker isn’t too much.
69 October 30th, 2006 at 11:08 pm
James says:
Now to comment on my new XD-45 w/4″ barrel. WOW! I held one at a gun show a couple weeks ago and was immediately impressed with its balance, the fact if had ambidexterous mag release. (Being left handed, it is nice to see a manufacturer go the extra mile to make me feel that as a significant minority in the world population, my needs are importaint.) ()-: It feels even better with a fully loaded clip! I had decided that a 45 would be my choice for personal defense and a relative suggested I look into Springfield. I had not yet done a lot of research and therefore wasn’t ready to make a desicion. But about an hour later I went back to the table with the XDs and picked up the 45 again. It felt natural in my hand. The gun shop owner must have remembered me from earlier and said let me make you a deal on that. And that he did!
I have only put about 300 rounds through it so far — Wolf 230gr. FMJ, Blazer 230gr. FMJ and Federal HydraShock 185gr. Thus far, no misfires or jams. I have yet to test the Hornady 185gr. JHP/XTP round for personal defense purposes. I also want to test a couple more brands of FMJ for practice. But at this point, Wolf holds the lead for price and reliability.
70 November 1st, 2006 at 1:47 am
Zak says:
I’m in the market for a handgun to be used for home protection and range. What is the recommended way of getting my hands on one? Should I go pick one up at the local shop, or search around? Anyone with some insight would be great to hear from. I’m a rifle and shotgun owner, but I am new to purchasing handguns. Would you also recommend a 9 or 40?
Thanks
Zak
71 November 9th, 2006 at 12:23 am
Michael says:
I just purchased the xd 40 4″ service model and took it to the local range yesterday for the first time. I put just over 200 rounds through it with no sign of any problems at all. As far as being accurate you can’t beat it. Great weapon.
I carry “or carried” a Ruger P95 9mm for several years and it looks like it’s been replaced.
As far as recommendations you can’t do much better than the XD 40. After you get your hands on one you’ll be hooked.
72 November 9th, 2006 at 12:14 pm
Adam says:
New XD-45ACP COMPACT:
Springfield has just come out with a XD 45ACP “Compact”, which maintains the 4″ bbl of the service model, but chops the butt by 3/4″. Almost exact size of a Glock 19/23, but a 10 shot 45ACP. They also have the XDGear Mag/grip extentions for it, so you can use full size 45ACP mags in it and grip 3 fingers instead of two. 3/4 ” shorter butt might not seem like much, but it really makes a big dif. when carrying around all day. The longer bbl. reduces felt recoil and increases practical accuracy, so it might be a real nice solution for those wanting both a CCW carry gun and a duty gun all in one.
9MM vs 40CAL:
As for which caliber to go with for the XD-SC, I have the .40, the girlfriend has the 9mm. If you’re a girl, have girlish proportions, are new to shooting, or are going to burn through 200 rounds a weekend in IDPA shoots, go with the 9mm. Otherwise, the 40 Cal wins in my book. It has the better balistics by about 20% and regardless of the age old debate of calibers, 20% more energy is a better thing to have than not. Of course, you pay for it in recoil (I’d say you feel that 20% in increased recoil over the 9mm), but it’s not so much as to slow me down in speed or accuracy for 7 yard double taps, so I think it’s good to go for for a seasoned shooter.
AMMO NOTE:
If you are going to carry Cor-bon ammo in the XD-SC’s, make sure and fire them as your first mag durring each range visit… they are significantly more snappy then the Winchester White Box from Walmart you brought to train with (about an extra 30-40% over that White Box), so you should get used to that snap by shooting it first off.
73 November 12th, 2006 at 9:48 am
patrick says:
i recently bought the XD40 .40cal and love it i hope the army goes back to the .45 because the 9mm is not living up to standards on the battle field
74 November 12th, 2006 at 9:53 am
gary chang last of the algonquins says:
just wanted to say how much i love the XD .40cal net to the colt python this is my favorite pistol to shoot i even started carrying the XD40 in stead of my Berretta its just more comfterble and you cant go wrong with a .40 more stopping power and it can get through walls and windows without more than one round unlike the 9mm
75 November 13th, 2006 at 2:34 am
Joe says:
I have owned my XD-40 sub-compact for over a year and it is by far the finest weapon I’ve owned. I have ran over 1500 rds through it and have never had a jam. If you want it as your carry weapon I wouldn’t buy the tricked out package with the light and the 12 rd mag as I have trouble concealing it with the extended mag in. Save 50 bucks and skip the light as the only thing I have ever used it for was a time my power went out! Also if your a novice I don’t think you will find an easier weapon to maintain. You can completely strip it in about 15 seconds. All in all if you have the need buy an XD pistol! I also own a service model XD-9 and once again after nearly 2000 rds through that one not a single jam.
76 November 20th, 2006 at 9:03 pm
Michael says:
I just wanted to add my 2 cents to the forum. I bought the xd 40 just about 4 months ago and I LOVE IT. I’ve put somewhere around 1200 rounds through it so far with not even a hint of trouble. Accuracy is excellent, and it is just a pure joy to fire. I’ve been around guns my whole life and have fired more handguns than I can count “20+ years in the military helped” and the XD is by far the best. Glocks can’t even compare. EXCELLENT WEAPON.
77 November 22nd, 2006 at 11:27 pm
Marvin says:
I have shot Fiocci 9mm, 40 and 45 in XD and XD SC for 5 years and have never had a failure of the ammo or the pistol. I would not have anything but SA XD pistols. They just work.
78 November 29th, 2006 at 12:36 am
MGB says:
I am trying to buy an XD40 sub compact and cannot find one. I have heard Springfield is sold out for several months. Does anyone know where to buy one in Texas?
79 December 14th, 2006 at 8:59 pm
Rob says:
I own the XD .45ACP and I have pumped about 1000 rounds through it.. Never jammed and is very smooth straight out of the box.
80 December 22nd, 2006 at 4:57 am
Carson says:
I have the XD service model 9mm. It is a great gun and I would recommend it to anyone. I like it so muck that I am getting the XD .40 subcompact. I like the extended clip and if it performs like my 9mm I will be more than satisfied. I frequent the range and have shot most of the 9mm that are available to rent. I think the springfield XD shoots the best!
81 December 28th, 2006 at 7:58 pm
JB says:
Sorry, I’m going back a couple of posts to add my .02 regarding carrying without a round in the chamber.
Brian, you say you’re an officer - does that mean military, or police? Frankly, I don’t think that you’re either from the comments you posted. Both LEOs and Military Police/Security Forces carry loaded and chambered. I’ve worked for both. I recently did a tour with the Security Forces squadron at my base, and we carried the M9 (of couse), loaded with hollowpoints, round in the chamber, safety OFF but hammer de-cocked. I guess that’s necessary when protecting $30M fighter aircraft, but I didnt for one second feel unsafe doing it. We had a 30 foot standoff distance for persons armed with edged weapons - if I had to draw my sidearm, all I needed to do was pull the trigger. Police officers also carry with a round in the chamber.
I’m going to be purchasing an XD40 in a couple of days to use as my primary duty weapon for a law enforcement agency I was recently hired onto. I’ll post my comments after I fire it, but I can say that after only holding it, I was sold. It points very naturally, and it is very comfortable to hold.
Mike, the grip safety doesnt bother me in the slightest, either. It fully depresses when the gun is properly held, so it shouldn’t be and issue when firing unless you limp-wrist the gun - and if you do that, the gun wont fire! If you’re concerned about it, try to find a range that has a rental XD and try it out. I doubt you’ll be bothered by it when shooting, but every person is different. Good luck!
82 December 29th, 2006 at 12:08 pm
Brian F. says:
Does anyone have any first hand info on the comparison between the XD9sub and the XD40sub in terms of recoil and acurracy? I have the XD-9 as one of my ccw weapons, and despite the short barrel, I find it to be extremely acurrate, even well beyond any range at which one should reasonably expect to defensively engage an adversary. While a 9mm with the proper ammo config is certainly capable of stopping an offender, I would prefer a larger round with higher stopping power. Shot a friend’s Glock 27 and didn’t care for the recoil. Not that it was excessive, but it was far “snappier” than the XD-9, or even a Springfield 1911 .45. Just not smooth at all and more difficult to resight for follow-on shots. Considering moving to the XD-40, has anyone fired all three? (XD9, XD40, Glock-27) who would be willing to provide a comparison? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks, Brian.
83 December 31st, 2006 at 6:19 am
JB says:
Brian, I’ve shot the G27 and the XD40. Haven’t shot the XD9, but have fired many 9mm guns. Yes, the G27 is a hand cannon. I don’t care for it either. The XD40, while a bit zippier than any 9mm would be, is very managable. Target reaquisition is very fast, especially compared to the G27 because of the (in my opinion) better grip angle.
84 January 1st, 2007 at 9:30 am
Brian F. says:
JB - Thanks for the post. I think I’ll be moving to the XD40. One other post I’d read on Packing.org suggested looking into a 40 barrel as the slides and frame were the same, that would be good if the cost were comparable, but I think given the need to choose I’ll be moving up 1 cal. Thanks for your input.
~Brian
85 January 1st, 2007 at 9:46 pm
jon says:
If you look up the springfield armory website you will see that they have a selection of xd’s that have ported barrels for less recoil- I will hopefully be buying one shortly!
86 January 10th, 2007 at 2:10 am
Steve B. says:
Just purchased a new XD40 sub from the Gun Show at Dulles Expo Center in Virginia for $459.00, which included the pistol pack (case packed full of goodies). Considered several compacts for upgrading my primary CCW carry from an old but reliable S&W .38 Snubnose. Final deciding factor over several makes considered….XD40 most comfortable and very natural grip feel. I actually feel in control of the weapon, not “adapting” to it’s grips. First box of rounds were Federal .40 S&W (FBI Load) - no problems at all. Right out of the box, I was amazed at the XD40’s accuracy, stability, natural point and aim ability, and the smoothness of the action on recoil, (very smooth and light in my opinion). I loved shooting my Barretta 92F for years, but the XD40 was simply a pleasure to shoot and conceals very easily! Not only did I shoot better than expected for a sub-compact, even my 74 yr old father (Korean War Marine), who is not “into” guns, took it for a test fire with me this weekend and shot an impressive group (half dollar size) at 25′. His basic marksmanship knowledge served him well, the XD40 delivered the confidence he deserved!
87 January 10th, 2007 at 8:02 pm
Dan says:
I bought a XD40 service model about a year ago, great gun. The only problem I have had with it was that the rear sight was a little off, but nothing a brass punch and a several rounds couldn’t fix. Other than that, I have put around 4,000 rounds through it (several brands of factory loads), consistently accurate, and has never jammed. I have heard alot of people complaining about the use of multiple safeties (grip + trigger), but if you know how to handle a gun, you will not even notice them.
88 January 10th, 2007 at 11:36 pm
Shenard says:
I have the XD9 SC and it’s the best gun I’ve ever shot or owned. It’s so comfortable & easy to grip, my aim is much better on this gun than any other gun. I also have a glock & S&W 9mm but this is my gun of choice.
89 January 17th, 2007 at 1:54 am
XTeacher says:
Hey folks,
Good discussion. I bought a XD 40 sub-compact for CCW about two weeks ago and absolutely love it. So far, I’ve only put 300 rounds through it but have had absolutely no problems. It was a toss-up between the Glock 30 and the XD, and after having fired my dad’s Glock 30 and merely handling the XD, I was completely won over by the way it felt in my hand as compared to the Glock, which, by the way, is a fine weapon. . . .in fact, I think that for my next purchase (once I remove my testicles from my wife’s purse where she has kept them since I bought a new gun without consulting her), I’ll probably get a Glock 29 just to try out the 10mm. Heck, to be honest, I have’t encountered too many handguns that I haven’t liked, so maybe I’m not the most discriminating shooter.
What surpised me most is the fact that on my second trip to the range, I shot the XD nearly as well as I shot my 1911 (which is still my favorite, but a little unwieldy for concealment as a full-frame). I feel confident enough with the XD’s safety features to carry it ready to fire, but I find myself flicking a phantom thumb safety whenever I do draw and fire drills. The fact that any police dept. would prefer the Israeli draw truly frightens me b/c in a stressful situtation, I see the potential for a negligent discharge by those who are not exceptionally well-trained in drawing in this fashion, and I or my kid might be in the vicinity of such a ND one day. FWIW, I am not a police officer.
90 January 22nd, 2007 at 11:57 pm
Jack MacCarty says:
“Brian, you say you’re an officer - does that mean military, or police? Frankly, I don’t think that you’re either from the comments you posted. Both LEOs and Military Police/Security Forces carry loaded and chambered. I’ve worked for both. I recently did a tour with the Security Forces squadron at my base, and we carried the M9 (of couse), loaded with hollowpoints, round in the chamber, safety OFF but hammer de-cocked. I guess that’s necessary when protecting $30M fighter aircraft, but I didnt for one second feel unsafe doing it. We had a 30 foot standoff distance for persons armed with edged weapons - if I had to draw my sidearm, all I needed to do was pull the trigger. Police officers also carry with a round in the chamber.”
Comment by JB — December 28, 2006 @ 7:58 pm
Are you so sure that all police are required to carry their service weapon chambered? From what I understand… State to state, precinct to to precinct, rules, can and do, change from time to time….
Lets try to keep an objective mind while posting, eh?
91 January 23rd, 2007 at 8:38 am
Brian B. says:
For the record…
I am a law enforcement officer. My father is a law enforcement officer, My brother is a law enforcement officer… My uncle is a law enforcement officer, most of our friends are law enforcements officers… I think you get the point.
In the many years of being associated with LEO’s, I have seen a few that don’t carry a loaded and charged semi-auto. On the other hand, I can’t say I have ever heard of an agency that required their officers to carry their semi-auto weapon without a round chambered. I think the general consensus on that would be that a LEO should always be ready to defend himself or others and that ability would be greatly diminished if he first had to charge his weapon before being able to respond to a threat. But those I mentioned earlier prefer not to carry charged weapons because they feel safer around their own kids, or other people’s kids, and the public in general. They figure if someone was to get their weapon from them, or come across their uncharged weapon, by the time that person realized that the weapon failed to fire, their spare could be drawn, they could be well out of harms way, or disarm the individual by then. However, I do not agree with this mindset. BE PREPARED!
Now to the XD: I fired an XD40 Two-Tone 4″ today and fell deeply in love with the weapon. I shot a tighter grouping with it than any other weapon I have ever shot besides my dad’s Colt 1911 .45 ACP Competition Series (I nornmally shoot a 117-120 out of 120 on the course).
We put over 200 reloaded rounds through the XD40 with one (1) malfunction (failure to feed). Comparatively, I would have had maybe two or three (2 or 3) of the same type failures through my Sig P226 (Duty) with the same amount of rejacketed rounds. I found the trigger pull to be smooth and consistent and the weapon felt very comfortable in my hands. On the downside, I still have the red mark on my thumb from the massive recoil generated by the XD earlier today. Actually, shooting the gun was not fun. The score it produced, on the other had, made it worth it. I am now looking to try a XD9 SUB to possibly carry as a backup/off duty weapon. When I find one and fire it, I’ll let you all know.
92 January 26th, 2007 at 7:10 pm
Ariel Miller says:
Commenting on comment #2 re. the Taurus 24/7. It does have a “single action double action” - good description. Try one and you’ll see. The striker is typically pre-cocked by the action of the slide and has a light “single action” pull. If it doesn’t go bang for some reason, like a light strike or hard primer, another squeeze of the trigger, more of a “double-action” pull since the striker isn’t pre-cocked, will strike the primer again. This multiple strike capability is one of the best features of the pistol, IMO and should be copied immediately by Glock, Kahr, and Springfield - all of which only allow the first strike. If that doesn’t work, the slide has to be racked manually to recock the striker.
93 February 3rd, 2007 at 8:02 pm
Dan H. says:
Re: Bart Stevens May 30,2006. I have the same problem you had with my sub-compact shooting to the left. My rear sight is definately off center to the left. An officer friend told me it probably could be tapped over as there are no obvious signs of locations to adjust it. What is the toll you used? Thank you for your comments regarding other guns. I own a Ruger .45 and an eaa .40. both are excellend weapons and shoot great. The .45 however is a little too laarge for my hand and is too large too conceal. the .40 fits perfect but still too large too conceal. My xd 40 sub-compact, which i too fell in love with after going through the 1st 3 mags, is perfect for me in fit and concealment. give Texas a big howdy froma PA Texan.
To Trevor in Iraq. (March 1,2006)Thank you sincerely for your service. You deserve and xd!
Those looking for the xd’s should look to Cabella’s. Harrisburg, PA location had a load.
94 February 14th, 2007 at 5:46 am
Tommy S. says:
Thanks guys for all the info.Currently have money down on XD40 sub compact.Someone was right when they said their hard to find in Texas.My brother-in-law bought XD9 and loves it.This gun is a bargain for what comes with it and with 2 kids the safety features are a plus.Thanks again for the comments.
95 June 27th, 2007 at 1:26 pm
Ronnie J. Burch says:
I have a XD .40 I haven’t found anything to not like about it. A very sweet shooter and a good carry gun.
96 July 1st, 2007 at 4:29 am
calista says:
Read some comments saying that it recoils less than a glock 26. Not true. They may both have double recoil springs ala Khar (the best to conceal shoot and handle in a metal frame, for my size) but the xd has a higher barrel axis, ie sitting higher on top of your hand. I had the xd9. it did not shoot better than my glo