scribblings from a deist transhumanist libertarian minarchist citizen soldier

Literacy rates

I am currently taking an American history class in college. I was amazed to read that in the 1850 census, it was determined that New England had a 0.4% illiteracy rate among adults. Let’s look at illiteracy today, shall we?

Illiteracy this extensive is virtually unprecedented in America’s history. Eighty years ago, in 1910, only 2.2 percent of American children between the ages of ten and fourteen could neither read nor write. It is important to remember that the illiteracy of 1910 reflected for the most part children who never had the advantage of schooling. The illiterates of today, however, are not people who never went to school; they are, for the most part, individuals who have spent eight to twelve years in public schools.

Clearly incompetence of this magnitude is not the result of accident. A large part of the blame rests with the educational establishment itself, the very people and institutions entrusted with the task of educating America’s children.

There is a growing body of evidence that suggests that many of our public school teachers are themselves woefully under-educated. In 1983, for example, school teachers in Houston, Texas were required to take a competency test. More than 60 percent of the teachers failed the reading part of the test. Forty-six percent failed the math section while 26 percent could not pass the writing exam. As if this weren’t bad enough, 763 of the more than 3,000 teachers taking the test cheated.

How well can your kid read and write? Is he or she capable of expressing himself in terms the rest of us can understand?

Similar Posts:

| Print This Post Print This Post |
  • Kristin
    I'm writing a paper and literacy rates of the 1800s is a big factor in it, although not the main point. Do you know where I can find more information on literacy rates? Thanks!
  • In my opinion, our [America’s] teachers are underpaid and under appreciated.
    How do you quantify "appreciated"?
    And an average pay of $60k at 20 years seniority with a starting pay at 35k doesn't sound too bad to me...
    http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=High_Sc...
  • Pod
    Well.. mmm. In my opinion, our [America's] teachers are underpaid and under appreciated. These teachers that work really hard to teach our kids have no way of really disciplining students who are disrespectful or disruptive.

    Why would one want to be a teacher when teachers are, essentially, treated like dirt? Teachers cannot say anything for fear of the school's administrators coming down on them for "hurting a student's feelings" or whatnot.

    Is being literate really as important in today's world as it was decades ago?

    Don't get me wrong.. I love to read. I read whenever I have free time (and if I do not have free time, I will MAKE free time). I love to expand my mind.

    But.. do today's jobs require reading as much as they once did? There are thousands of different jobs one can pursue. Many of these jobs do not require intellectual work.

    Furthermore, there are, in my opinion, different kinds of literacy. You can physically be able to read words without being able to comprehend what you are reading.

    Visit my web page if you wish for further discussion, as I found this article whilst doing a google search for something else. =P My apologies for intruding on your conversation!
  • powys
    Trevor is right about us spending thousands of times more money on education than we did in the 1800;s, but then in the early 1800's most people were illiterate. Today we try to drag every student through the schooling experience, but the problem is that we are NOT born with identical learning ability. The "bell curve" tells us all we ought to know about the way that intelligence is normally distributed. The left tail of the curve will always be a challenge for the teacher (and for society) and no amount of hand-wringing can change what nature has handed out.
  • I would consider teaching as a retirement career, but only if I were allowed to carry a concealed weapon. I have no interest in campuses where weapons are not allowed.

    It is intent that causes problems, not access to tools. As far as paying illiterates to breed, ugh. You're right, and I don't have any suggestions that people want to hear on that topic.
  • I've actually considered teaching high school science or math courses as a second career after the software engineering profession has had enough of my services. I'm sure that I could do at least as good a job as most of those doing it now. Regrettably, the state of Texas requires about three years worth of touchy-feely courses on child development and such for a teaching certificate. I'd probably go berserk. I couldn't agree more that the state ought to "put education back in the hands of people who are actually good at it," or who at least know their subject.

    I doubt that such a measure would solve the illiteracy problem, however. As our ruling class continues to replace us with more complaisant Latin American campesinos, illiteracy rates can only increase. Needlesss to say, the welfare state, which pays illiterates to breed, doesn't help either.
  • Although I completely disagree with the conclusions of the article I quoted regarding how to solve illiteracy, I do think the more literate a society is, the better off all of its members are. You are right that government spending won't fix it.

    We spend thousands of times more per school child now than we did in the 1800's yet the literacy rates are lower. Maybe our government should put education back in the hands of people who are actually good at it, and work on some other pet project.
  • There are some who suggest that different populations have different capacities for learning. Of course, you wouldn't want to repeat any of this to your history prof, for fear of flunking the course.

    My point is that higher illiteracy rates do not imply a crisis, as the article you linked above calls it. At least, it's not a crisis that can be addressed by spending a lot of taxpayers' money on the educational system. Controlling the borders might halt the increase in illiteracy, but we can't expect our government to do that, can we?
  • Certainly higher illiteracy rates are related to minority populations - but more to the fact that they have different cultures than that they are ethnically different. If you cannot speak proper English, that makes it harder to read and write.
  • Evil redneck that I am, I can't help but play a little numbers game. The article says, "Thirteen percent of American seventeen-year-olds are illiterate, according to a recent issue of Time; the estimate for minority youth is an astonishing forty percent." According to the last census, America was about 69% white. (I'll arbitrarily assume that the percentage applies across all age groups, which it obviously does not. Minorities are a higher percentage of younger age groups.) So 40% of 31% is 12.4%, which is pretty close to that 13% illiteracy figure. Could it be that illiteracy occurs almost entirely among minorities? Could higher illiteracy rates be merely a reflection of a larger minority population?
  • Dan, sorry your link is incomplete. If you would like to correct it, I'll take a look see. All you need to do is edit your post and click the little arrow at the bottom for an Ext Link tool, which will allow you to cut and past the thing in there.
  • Yes, I do Zendo Deb. That quote came from an article entitled The Three Kinds of Illiteracy by Ronald Nash. I didn't link it because my blog's server crashed when I initially tried to save this post.
  • Do you have a reference for that quote?
  • I don't know about illiteracy rates, but education in general has been in a downfall for sometime.

    Here's my take : Academically Challenged"
blog comments powered by Disqus
Powered by Wordpress | Designed by Elegant Themes