The mysteries of SANs

SAN. What a nice three letter acronym. Zzzzzz. Well it does stand for something - storage area network. And since the company that employs me has been going through a massive growth streak, we’ve implemented a SAN. If SANs had existed during the Middle Ages, they would have been managed by wizards and other practitioners of assorted arcanery. You almost need a new bachelor’s degree to understand the basic concepts that underlay the technology.

So anyhow, while I was away at war, the company, led by my trusty right hand man, who I’ll refer to as Mighty T, put in a fibre channel SAN in the main corporate office. Problem - we have four corporate offices, each of which should probably have its own SAN. After all, our data pipes are T1s not OC3s. It takes time for the electronic soup to move back and forth through those little pipes. Our employees are taking cold data showers. They’re tired of waiting for the information to warm up…

Long story short - we’re investigating new SAN solutions that might be better fitted to our company’s needs. Enter the vendors.

Using only the company initials (I lie sometimes), we’re in talks with Left Hand Networks and Equallogic. They are not the only two dealers of SANs in existence, but we don’t have time to listen to 17 pitches. I wish we did, because I could probably get a free lunch every time.

Left Hand Networks seems to have a less proprietary thing going, and I tend to like that approach. They use several different vendors hardware to build their systems, and they had a good pitch. Equallogic is a bigger company. I missed their pitch because I was still in Iraq. So I’m scouring the net today for comparisons of the two vendors SAN systems.

First, let me explain that our basic operating premise is that fibre channel is too expensive and complicated for us. We think iSCSI will be the dominant SAN technology. It’s cheaper, more scalable, seems very reliable and redundant and most of all it’s cheaper. According to Network Computing:

iSCSI accounts for only two percent of the SAN market, but its low cost and ease of use are positioning it for growth. We examined four iSCSI modular SANs and found our Editor’s Choice running circles around the competition.

Network computing also decided that they had a clear winner in their “real-world” tests:

In our real-world performance tests, the EqualLogic dominated the competition, with MPC and LeftHand Networks following at a distant second and third.

On the other hand, Storage Networking World Online (crappy long name, I know) says that:

Consistent customer feedback says that LeftHand’s solution is “easy to implement,” “really drag-and-drop storage” with “the ability to easily auto grow volumes.” One user declares, “We are one of the few organizations our size with a DR plan in place. The reason is that LeftHand makes it so easy to do.” Upgrades are reported to be very smooth and often done while in production.

While users report an occasional hardware failure, they are highly complimentary about SAN/iQ’s ability to tolerate such failures with minimal degradation due to seamless, non-disruptive re-striping. Users are also very happy with LeftHand’s direct support.

And in the “guys I know” department, one guy has a Left Hand SAN solution and loves it. And another guy I know who consults for a living says they are a “garage operation” and to stay away. It’s the age old dilemma we’ve all faced at one time or another - do I want to buy my SAN from the big name corporate suits or should I give the little guys in Dockers and scuffed hush puppies a chance?

What I want to know is - do any of you experienced uber-admins out there have an opinion *insert sarcasm*? Is EqualLogic the only game in town when it comes to an iSCSI SAN? Some of you have real world experience that you might share with no vested interest in the eventual outcome for my company. I want to hear from you. I want to know what you think of EqualLogic, Intransa, StoneFly, Nimbus Data, FalconStor, Xiotech or Network Appliance. Who has the best product, the best price and the best support? We need all three in a package. That should be simple, shouldn’t it?

Spread this meme:
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Fark
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Google
  • Digg
  • Reddit

Related posts:


3 Responses to “The mysteries of SANs”




  1. Dale says:

    Ahhhh, the problem of choosing among alternatives for a best fit scenario that will not hold your company back as the future evolves into an unknown direction. Where have we faced that situation before?

    Congratulations and welcome to management. Seeking the opinions of others is a good first step. I suggest to you though that the devil is in the details and you will find yourself with recommendations 1. from people who never stretched their systems, 2. from people who have tried one system but not others, 3. from people who overloaded their systems and finally from those who chose the wrong system for their application. I predict that you will not find a conclusion among your replies.

    I propose the following approach: eliminate the companies whose people you do not like (the company has values that are different than yours), eliminate companies who cannot coordinate among themselves (this will continue to be true), and if more than one company remains, choose the one with the simplest approach to the technology deployed (you will have a greater likelihood of flexible solutions) and whose product is less than six years old but more than three(the serious problems have been resolved but they are not yet developing a replacement technology).

    The size of the company is not relevant but the financial performance is.
    I was with a core team that examined application software for a smaller division’s operation. We fought corporate IT and won. They wanted a multi-million dollar proven ‘indestructible’ compartmentalized business app as opposed to a flexible, user-oriented app that required less IT. Our results were lauded throughout the organization for the next 3 years and only a corporate re-org that combined three groups into one and moved them 900 miles away halted our success.

    In choosing wisely, it is not the technology that is important but the use of technology and the team that can create the solutions for business problems.

    Reply to this comment



  2. Trevor says:

    Dale,

    You are absolutely right about the human elements being important. Without a good company to support whatever new hardware eventually gets put in place nothing good will come of the purchases.

    That’s why many large corporations are switching back to U.S. tech support after having inconvenienced and frustrated their customers by routing support calls to hard to understand overseas “technicians.”

    I’ve been through a few “corporate reorganizations” myself. Here’s to avoiding future ones…

    Reply to this comment



  3. the will to exist says:

    Discuss! [IMG ] | Email This Post [IMG ] | Print This Post [IMG ] | Permalink [IMG ] | 2 comments

    Reply to this comment

Don't be a dweeb. Speak up.