scribblings from a deist transhumanist libertarian minarchist citizen soldier

The short, ugly life of a monster

Your Sunday must read is Requiem for a Nightmare, by James G. Poulos.

But the dilemma of the war — that in order to free Iraq, the coalition created a realm of murder and despair — came about courtesy of a man whose very idea of strategy involved exploiting the weakness and good faith of the liberal project of freedom. Stretched between monsters of Islam like Zarqawi and the Muslim angels who have striven for peace, brotherhood, and order in Iraq, a whole range of varyingly aggrieved citizens found their complicity suddenly on the market. Enlistment in al Qaeda in Iraq brought a perverse stability that joblessness could not. The planting of a roadside bomb brought ready cash. Silence itself — won by threats if not by payola — was a commodity of war. And true enough the fabric of Iraqi society itself had no shortage of threads for Zarqawi to pull. The denominations of Sunni and Shi’a became through his blood-colored glasses factions of mutual destruction; the hordes of hardened criminals turned out on the streets in one of Saddam’s last treasons against his own people became a field of opportunity.

This above is a good read no matter who you blame for the messiness that is modern Iraq.

If life is a river, perspective is the current.

Another crisis of legitimacy for which he can be held responsible, and perhaps the worst, was this profane mockery of the laws of armed conflict. Citizens were to be made targets — now, even to the exclusion of actual soldiers. Combatants were to be relieved of the quaint, millennia-old obligation of wearing uniforms. And killing was to be conducted primarily by suicide operations and by the robotic proxy of the IED — a clever new acronym for what was once the bane of people for peace everywhere: land mines.

Zarqawi sowed what he reaped. He worked hard to earn his end.

Similar Posts:

| Print This Post Print This Post |
  • Elizabeth,

    My point was that Zarqawi was evil. I think you're suggesting I should have tacked on some sort of disclaimer that governments are also evil, or perhaps that they are more evil? I don't get it...

    Zarqawi wasn't trying to rebuild anything, or accomplish any humanitarian goals, or provide Iraq with anything good. He was just pure evil, and had nothing to offer any except pain, death, suffering and religious fervor.
  • Trevor: I'm not trying to change "you." I'm merely pointing out an omission.
  • Hiroshima was 50 years ago, and none of the men who made that decision are named Zarqawi. What is it you hope to change about me by trying to compare Hiroshima to Zarqawi, Elizabeth?

    Governments killed 100 million people last century. I know. I know which ones had the worst records too. None of that makes Zarqawi any less of a monster. Had I been faced with the same choices I think he saw himself faced with, I wouldn't have chosen as he did and I despise anyone who thinks Zarqawi was justified in sawing off people's heads, or blowing people up on their way to work, etc.

    I don't know if you noticed, but he wasn't even Iraqi, he was just good at killing Iraqis. I am spending a year of my life over here, supporting people in making a choice I completely disagree with. I would never vote for an Islamic Republic, but I support Iraqis right to choose that for themselves.

    Zarqawi was about Zarqawi, and he didn't care who got hurt making a name for himself as a "holy warrior." Good riddance.
  • Targeting civilians is hardly a Zarqawi invention. The targeting of civilians has been used not only by various terrorist militias from different parts of the globe in different decades of the 20th and other centuries, but also by governments. Think about Hiroshima.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Powered by Wordpress | Designed by Elegant Themes