scribblings from a deist transhumanist libertarian minarchist citizen soldier

Will the town of Weare vote to seize Justice Souter’s property?

Show your support for seizing the home of Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter.

Press Release

For Release Monday, June 27 to New Hampshire media
For Release Tuesday, June 28 to all other media

Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on Souter’s land.

Justice Souter’s vote in the “Kelo vs. City of New London” decision allows city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.

On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This is the present location of Mr. Souter’s home.

Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.

The proposed development, called “The Lost Liberty Hotel” will feature the “Just Desserts Café” and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon’s Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand’s novel “Atlas Shrugged.”

Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.

“This is not a prank” said Clements, “The Towne of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development.”

Clements’ plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice and participants in the Free State Project among others.

# # #

Logan Darrow Clements
Freestar Media, LLC

Phone 310-593-4843
logan@freestarmedia.com

http://www.freestarmedia.com

Similar Posts:

| Print This Post Print This Post |
  • NHampshire
    This guy Clements was the reason the citizens peition failed. NH doesn't take kindly to outsiders and they already had a petition to do this which most people were on board with.

    Clements ruined for them.
    http://www.cnht.org/news/2009/05/01/will-souter-b...
  • Dan
    I just found your site. I did not know the part about Atlas Shrugged. I read that seven times.
  • Thanks for clarifying, Jake. I appreciate it.
  • What I was trying to say was from now on they will be more carefull when they make rullings and may begin to uphold the constitution and stop rewriting it when their rullings hurt them.
  • The fact that this story is getting widespread publicity and even a warm reception in some quarters makes me very happy.
  • Frank Martin
    Its been clarifyed in multiple news reports, at least about the attempt of taking the property.

    I find this fitting.. if it goes through.
  • If the Supremes want to make up idiotic laws such as this, let’s make sure that they are amongst the first to be affected by them.
  • Jake,

    Can you clarify that? Did you mean that the justices will uphold their own ruling and allow their own private property to be seized?
  • I think they may uphold the law instead of make the law when it turns against them.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Powered by Wordpress | Designed by Elegant Themes