Your kid is an idiot because of people like Ulrica Corbett
Friday, 3 June 2005 | 408 readers so far
Chances are, if your child is being publically educated in the United States, they are good at filling out forms and not much else. It’s also likely they have very low expectations from authority figures, since most of the figures in authority are mentally incapacitated. A prime example - meet Ulrica Corbett, Prinicipal, Anita White Carson Middle School.
Here’s the long story in short form. A teacher at this middle school by the name of Matthew Lund is friends with a Sargeant of Marines serving in Iraq named Zach Richardson, who just returned from duty in Iraq. Mr. Lund setup a correspondence between Sgt. Richardson and school children at Anita White Carson Middle School. This is a healthy thing. School children should be exposed to those serving them in wars. Whether you think the war is right or wrong, it’s healthy to talk with those who are fighting it. How else will you get real opinions? Certainly not from top government officials or the news media.
When Sgt. Richardson returned to the United States he told Matthew Lund that he wanted to come to the Carson Middle School to personally thank the students for their support and letters. Lund filled out and submitted a “Resource Visitor or Guest Speaker Form” and submitted it to Principal Corbett. Lund says he never got the form back from Corbett. He says he asked the Principal about the form, and was told that she was not going to look at it.”
–Neal Boortz
Pretty much everyone who has been within 1,000 yards of any public school knows they run on forms, and that without the proper form filled out nothing can be accomplished (not that much of any significance is anyhow.) But why would a public school principal ignore a request for another public servant (a military serviceperson) to visit schoolchildren and thank them for writing him while he was serving in a combat zone?
Ulrica Corbett appears to have been paid $66,282 in 2003 to manage your rugrats. I have a nagging suspicion that paying Ms. Corbett to manage a school is not a wise use of taxpayer funds.
Ms. Corbett apparently harbors ill will towards Marines, or maybe the military in general. Ms. Corbett needs to publicly defend herself. Until she does so successfully, I will harbor a nagging suspicion that Ms. Corbett is one of those types of people you encounter in life that the Marine Corps labels a “shitbird.”
I’m only speculating, but I’d love to hear from the principal parties in this matter. I want the undiluted facts out of the mouths of the participants. Ulrica Corbett, what is your problem? Sgt. Richardson, what’s your take? Mr. Lund, anything to say about the state of affairs at Anita White Carson Middle School?
What is it these kids are learning over there in Greensboro, Georgia?
Other bloggers thoughts on this topic:
Political Yen/Yang
Of the Mind
Conservative Dialysis
Nonsequiter Rantings
Patriots for Bush
Sierra Faith
Cognitively Dissonant
Susie Pie
Buck’s Blog
Update:












1 June 3rd, 2005 at 6:46 am
JHM says:
Did you check out her personal statement on the school’s Web page? Here it is:
My name is Ulrica Corbett and I am a native of Miami, Florida. I earned my Bachelor of Arts degree in English from Bethune-Cookman College in Daytona Beach, FL and my Master’s degree in Educational Leadership from the University of Central Florida (UCF) in Orlando, FL.
Prior to becoming a teacher I worked in Miami as a probation and parole officer. After successfully working with some youthful offenders I felt that I could possibly effect a change with more youth in a different setting. Since then I have taught high school English, Spanish and ESOL and middle school English. I have worked as an administrator in Florida, Alabama and Georgia in elementary, middle and high schools.
I adamantly despise the military and all it stands for, and will do anything I can to create a new generation of simpering liberals.
No, I’m kidding about that last paragraph. She didn’t really say that. But here’s her email address if you’re interested in getting a quote from her personally:
ulrica.corbett@greene.k12.ga.us
2 June 3rd, 2005 at 7:23 am
Mustang says:
LOL@JHM . . . too funny.
I hate to tell you this, but Miz Corbett is TYPICAL of most “educational leaders” in America today. The way I see it, in another generation, our kids will be intellectually better off as 2nd grade dropouts.
Semper Fi . . .
3 June 3rd, 2005 at 7:58 am
Trevor says:
Mustang, yes, I know she is typical and it scares the hell out of me. Every time I read a story about one of those soulless kids we’re pumping out in mass quantities today, I think first of the shitty quality of parenting going on, and second, I think of how godawful most school bureaucrats are. Today’s schools almost seem like little bubbles of a different, dumbed down reality to me.
If I was in school now, I see myself a) ending up in jail for some minor mistake or b) learning to be apathetic and unachieving, just like my bureaucratic overlords.
I realize there are probably many caring teachers and administrators still out there trying their hardest, but this sort of report is getting old.
4 June 3rd, 2005 at 9:04 am
Nonsequiter Rantings says:
Education or Indoctrination?
I’m just picturing what’s going to happen when some dumb liberal educrat does this to the “wrong Marine”… I can just see the infamous Colonel Jessup (see the Tom Cruise movie “A Few Good Men”.) completely going off on the poor principal…
B…
5 June 3rd, 2005 at 9:07 am
Trevor says:
I’m sure Sgt. Richardson considered it. I’m a former Marine and I sure would have.
6 June 3rd, 2005 at 9:21 am
Sabba Hillel says:
I sent my children to private (parochial) school for religious rather than pragmatic reasons. They are doing the same with my grandchildren. All I can say is that I am glad that I did so. A principal would consider himsel (or herself) a failure if he neglected to acknowledge a request from a teacher (even if the acknowledgement was a refusal).
It sounds as if the principal knew that there was no legitimatereason to refuse the request.
7 June 3rd, 2005 at 9:30 am
Trevor says:
Sabba,
I wholly support you in educating your children privately, as you see fit, with little to no interfece from the bloated behemoth we call modern American government.
Yes, it does sound as if this particular principal knew there was no legitimate reason to refuse this request. She should have encouraged this type of interaction between an adult serving his country and some of the children he is serving.
8 June 3rd, 2005 at 11:08 am
NIF says:
… Heartland article found via Gindy, who has more to say here! * Don’t let Marine Zach Richardson visit the school … ‘cuz remember, it’s for the “safety and welfare of our children” … or, as some put it “Your kid is an idiot because of people like Ulrica Corbett” * Insurrection : McCain is a “nannystatist F’tard” … although I disagree with the “this guy is Bill O’Reilly with a tan” part
* Summer camp for geeks, tinkerers and hackers (real hackers, not the bad guys)
9 June 3rd, 2005 at 12:33 pm
Poor Robert says:
If you had to entrust your child to either a Marine or a public school pinhead, is there any doubt which one you’d choose? More on the callous treatment of Richardson at Conservative Dialysis, Of the Mind, The Will to Exist Lord, what fools these educrats be.
10 June 3rd, 2005 at 3:55 pm
NIF says:
Footsoldier of Paychecks
Today’s dose of NIF - News, Interesting & Funny
11 June 3rd, 2005 at 5:55 pm
Barb says:
The first thing I notice about Corbett’s comments on the school website is that they are grammatically incorrect! This is not what I expect from a teacher.
12 June 3rd, 2005 at 6:02 pm
Trevor says:
It is what you should expect from a government bureaucrat though.
13 June 3rd, 2005 at 6:24 pm
cl says:
Ulrica Corbett should be fired. I certainly don’t want her in charge of my children. The “children’s safety,” what is the real reason she didn’t want the Sargent to visit?
14 June 5th, 2005 at 7:16 am
JHM says:
The “real reason,” I’m sure, is that the soldier would be able to tell the kids why the US is in Iraq. I’m sure his explanation would be different from what she’s been indoctrinating them with. God forbid we should have a group of kids proud of what the military is doing over there.
And her explanation, that she’s only looking out for the kids’ “safety and welfare,” is a big fact lie. If that was her honest concern, she would’ve turned down the teacher’s request directly. Instead, she decided to turn it into a game.
15 June 5th, 2005 at 11:08 am
Michelle Malkin says:
If you had to entrust your child to either a Marine or a public school pinhead, is there any doubt which one you’d choose? More on the callous treatment of Richardson at Conservative Dialysis, Of the Mind, The Will to Exist Lord, what fools these educrats be.
16 June 6th, 2005 at 12:39 pm
patrick stone says:
You know, this ridiculous assumption about Corbett’s insidious motives could only fly in a country full of middle class know-nothings who get most of their news from Rush Limbaugh and don’t take 5 seconds out of their precious day to devote to their children, including volunteering time at the schools so they can see up-close what kind of underfunded nightmare the schools have become with Republicans running the country into the ground. As a parent who does volunteer my time, I see the stress and pressure teachers and administrators are under and I see the way their funding and resources are steadily shrinking. It seems a lot more likely that the principal just didn’t have the time to deal with it. Maybe the paperwork got lost and the principal didn’t realize what was going on. Who knows?
Oh, I know that explanation goes against that right-wing stereotype of school administrators as liberal elitists sitting around all day plotting their evil schemes against the planet. I know that removes the rationale for getting all frothy-mouthed over it.
Look up news stories about this event and see that the school issued an apology for the misunderstanding and is working diligently to re-schedule the meeting. Yeah, that’s right, they’re apologizing and re-scheduling it. It looks a little less insidious, now, doesn’t it?
Oh funny… Neal Boortz didn’t mention the bit about these evil anti-American liberals working to re-schedule the meeting. Strange how that tidbit didn’t make it into his column. I wonder why that happened. Gosh… what a mystery… hmmm.
17 June 6th, 2005 at 1:46 pm
Danny Carlton -- alias "Jack Lewis" says:
Jawa Report Marine tossed out of government school …the news story can be read here. Neil Boortz, GM’s Corner, Conservative Dialysis, Cognitively Dissonant, Of the Mind, Michelle Malkin, Right Wing Howler, The Will to Exist , Political Yen/Yang, Nonsequiter Rantings, Patriots for Bush, Sierra Faith, Susie Pie, Buck’s Blog Posted by Danny Carlton at 08:45 AM Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
18 June 6th, 2005 at 8:10 pm
Sterling Roberts says:
If she is rescheduling the meeting, isn’t it interesting that it is after the media attention, hmmm.
It is not good on anybody’s part to make assumptions off of incomplete facts. Nor is it good to stereotype any individual. I only hope that our actions are in the best interest of our children, civilization, freedoms and country.
I only hope Sergeant Richardson gets the chance to say thanks to the kids who kept him company. And thanks to the teachers who encouraged this communication.
God bless America and our soldiers.
19 June 7th, 2005 at 1:38 am
patrick stone says:
No assumptions are good in this situation, especially Neal Boortz’s insultingly stupid assumption that it’s the evil liberal public schools.
Given how busy school administrators are, I wouldn’t be surprised if she didn’t even realize how important it was to the class until there was media attention. Seriously. Go check out how understaffed and overworked our public schools are nowadays. It’s gotten steadily worse over the last few years. It’s a travesty. Everyone screaming about this principal needs to stop and think carefully about this incident. If they really care about the kids, they need to ask why our schools are so sadly underfunded.
And if you think school admins are too strict about who can come in schools and who can’t or that they’re being overly bureucratic about it, then we need to stop and ask ourselves if we want terrorists to be able to freely roam school campuses. Which way do we want it? Do we want admins to keep these things in check or do we want to leave ourselves open to attack. You can’t have it both ways.
20 June 7th, 2005 at 2:14 am
Trevor says:
And if you think school admins are too strict about who can come in schools and who can’t or that they’re being overly bureucratic about it, then we need to stop and ask ourselves if we want terrorists to be able to freely roam school campuses.
Patrick,
It was Ulrica Corbett who had trouble distinguishing between a U.S. Marine and a terrorist.
Your comments indicate you might be confused as to the definition of an idiot. Ulrica Corbett may indeed have been too busy to look at or sign the form. That also makes her an idiot when it comes to time management.
Members of the armed services have already been screened multiple times by the feds. There should never have been any need to fill out the form. The man is an active duty Marine.
You assertion that all these assumptions about Ulrica Corbett are inappropriate deserve further examination. Assumptions are a tool that should be used carefully but I haven’t been able to find any statement from Ulrica Corbett denying that she despises the U.S. military and was merely being obstructionist in her desire to keep the Marine away from the impressionable young minds of children in her charge.
By the way, I do not allow the frothy-mouthed on this site. I am also not a fan of right-wing fanatics, so you’ll find they don’t get to write the articles here.
I’m a libertarian minarchist. It’s right in the title.
Public schools, for the most part, are destroying the quality of the public at large.
If Ulrica Corbett makes a public statement proving that she is one of those rare talented, dedicated public servants who actually serve rather than making others serve her, I’ll eat my words and apologize to her in writing.
Here’s how Ulrica Corbett can contact me with her statement, which I’ll happily report and comment on.
trevor.snyder@gmail.com
I’d be pleased to conduct a phone or in-person interview with her, and then reassess what I think of the situation. Of course, she’ll have to fill out the form first.
21 June 7th, 2005 at 2:33 am
patrick stone says:
You quote an article that assumed Ms. Corbett’s actions come from some kind of evil liberal agenda and you’re lecturing ME on rash assumptions? The irony!
“Public schools, for the most part, are destroying the quality of the public at large.”
When was the last time you stepped foot in a public school? I’ve found that those with the strongest opinions of them are usually the least involved. I’ve found that those who work in public schools are fine people with decent backgrounds and good ideas. That doesn’t always come across because their resources are slowly being sapped away. Look into it. I’m not making this up.
Also, re-read my previous comment. I didn’t say Sgt. Richardson was a terrorist (did you really read it that way?) I said, if we want to keep terrorists and other troublemakers off school campuses, then we have to let administrators police who comes and goes–not the teachers. And if those admins are too busy because their funding has fallen off sharply in the last few years to do that job appropriately (i.e., not having time to clear someone obviously as safe as Richardson) then what are we so outraged by? The misunderstanding of an underfunded school system or the underfunding of the system itself?
Everyone jumping to this overly emotional reaction that Corbett is to blame can only be explained by the fact that so few people actually go INSIDE schools and volunteer their time anymore. I see it firsthand. Very few parents get involved anymore. Trying to get them in to help out is like pulling teeth. Between that and the underfunding of the system, it’s no surprise to me that silly things like this incident happen. I only wish people understood the real root cause instead of jumping to crazy, politically biased and potentially destructive assumptions about the motives of people they have never even met.
22 June 7th, 2005 at 5:32 am
Trevor says:
I’ve invited Ms. Corbett to give me her input. So far she hasn’t. Until she does, I’m sticking with my general impressions based on the information I have.
I was unaware of the specialized administrator training Ms. Corbett has that allows her to determine which active duty decorated U.S. Marines may in fact be terrorists and troublemakers, and should therefore not be allowed on her campus.
I’d be glad to volunteer my time at your local public school. Hmm, let’s see - what skills do I have that I could share with kids in a positive way?
Oh, I know. I could teach them about responsible gun ownership and the true original intent of the 2nd Amendment. Just give me some times and dates when I could stop by. I’ll be happy to fill out the form first. I’ve already passed GBI and FBI background checks for several different purposes, so it shouldn’t be any problem to meet the stringent requirements for being within 1,000 yards of America’s public school youth.
23 June 8th, 2005 at 1:54 pm
patrick stone says:
Thanks for verifying that you have no idea what you’re talking about when it comes to public schools. See how easy it was to admit that? And FYI, administrators are in fact expected to police the campuses and keep very careful track of who comes and goes. That does change whether you mock it or not. I don’t get the sense that you really care about that fact as you keep making discursive comments intended to muddy the issue instead of dealing with the reality that it’s the likely cause for the weird behavior at the heart of this story.
24 June 8th, 2005 at 2:46 pm
Trevor says:
It seems to me that Ulrica Corbett was the one muddying the issue by ignoring the request.
Are you a public school administrator by any chance? I can’t figure out why you are such a strong defender of someone who thinks that a U.S. Marine represents a threat to the safety and welfare of U.S. schoolchildren. Reaching such a conclusion is indicative of poor ability to reason on the part of Ulrica Corbett.
By the way, you win the $2 fancy word contest for using discursive in a sentence.
25 June 8th, 2005 at 10:59 pm
ralph1533 says:
Considering her treatment of Mr. Lund, I wonder if her problem is not with the Military, but with white people.
26 June 8th, 2005 at 11:15 pm
Trevor says:
I suppose that is possible Ralph. Racism and bias do go both ways. It could even be a combination of ill will towards the military and white people. We won’t know unless we hear more from Ms. Corbett or the people who know her.
So far, that I am aware of, her only statement has been that she was doing it for the “safety of the children,” which is an incredible pile of steaming bullshit.
If schoolchildren have to worry about active duty Marines, then we should all just give up and lay down while our enemies rape the women and bayonet the men.
27 June 10th, 2005 at 2:40 pm
patrick stone says:
“It seems to me that Ulrica Corbett was the one muddying the issue by ignoring the request.”
Seems. Your assumption isn’t necessarily the truth and I see little to support such an assumption. Do you know something the rest of us do not? Have you done some kind of Vulcan mind-meld with her and now know her motives?
“Are you a public school administrator by any chance?”
No. But then, the issue isn’t me, right?
“I can’t figure out why you are such a strong defender of someone who thinks that a U.S. Marine represents a threat to the safety and welfare of U.S. schoolchildren. Reaching such a conclusion is indicative of poor ability to reason on the part of Ulrica Corbett.”
Wow… we’ve gone from her not approving a request to assuming she now considering Richardson a “threat.” You must teach me this Vulcan trick of yours. I would very much like to peer into the heads of others and divine their innermost thoughts. That’s remarkable!
“By the way, you win the $2 fancy word contest for using discursive in a sentence.”
“Discursive” is a fancy word? (Shrug.)
BTW, that’s suspiciously close to an ad hominem comment. Am I to be insulted for using “fancy” words? Does that make me a pointy-headed liberal elitist or something? Let’s keep the topic at hand in mind and steer clear of personal comments. Can we do that?
“So far, that I am aware of, her only statement has been that she was doing it for the “safety of the children,†which is an incredible pile of steaming bullshit.”
Sigh… you don’t understand what she means by that because (as you have admitted) you don’t volunteer your time in public schools. You’re assuming she’s stupid and doesn’t understand what a Marine is. The reality is that she (along with the rest of our pathetically under-funded public schools) is under a lot of pressure to keep track of who comes and goes and to make sure someone *is* who they claim they are–and that takes time to do, time that they simply don’t have to spare.
What’s to stop a terrorist from dressing up and claiming to be an active duty Marine who wants to speak to the kids in some class? As a school admin, I assume you would throw caution and policy to the wind and bow down before the uniform and let such a person have free reign of the school, right?
Probably. Do me a favor. If you ever get into school administration, let me know. I want to keep my kids as far away from your school as humanly possible.
28 June 10th, 2005 at 7:51 pm
The Will to Exist » Blog Archive » The decline of American education says:
[...] d the state of public education in the United States. Our dialogue is based on my original Ulrica Corbett post of several days ago. Ulrica Corbett is the school principal who ignored a request for a Marine [...]
29 July 12th, 2005 at 9:46 pm
The Will to Exist » Blog Archive » Ulrica Corbett, Matthew Lund and Marine Sgt. Zach Richardson update says:
[...] nd and Marine Sgt. Zach Richardson update
Boortz has posted an update on the saga of the Marine and the Prinicipal. The bad news - Ulrica Corbett is still influencing Georgia children. The go [...]
30 November 13th, 2006 at 10:35 pm
StumbleUpon says:
[...] Your page is now on StumbleUpon! For each appearance in your referral logs, one of our members has ’stumbled upon’ your site after clicking “Stumble!” on our toolbar to discover a new great site. Enter Your URL → [...]
31 December 3rd, 2007 at 11:20 pm
Michelle Malkin » PUBLIC SCHOOL TO MARINE: KEEP OUT says:
[...] More on the callous treatment of Richardson at Conservative Dialysis, Of the Mind, The Will to Exist [...]