Existentialist anarchism – Will To Exist http://willtoexist.com/ Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:41:31 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8 https://willtoexist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/icon-6-120x120.png Existentialist anarchism – Will To Exist http://willtoexist.com/ 32 32 ‘Search Party’ series finale recap: Dory hits the road with one final genre change, with the co-creator’s talks ending the coming-of-age comedy with [SPOILER]s https://willtoexist.com/search-party-series-finale-recap-dory-hits-the-road-with-one-final-genre-change-with-the-co-creators-talks-ending-the-coming-of-age-comedy-with-spoilers/ Sat, 08 Jan 2022 08:00:40 +0000 https://willtoexist.com/search-party-series-finale-recap-dory-hits-the-road-with-one-final-genre-change-with-the-co-creators-talks-ending-the-coming-of-age-comedy-with-spoilers/ SPOILER ALERT: This message contains details about the latest round of Research group, including the latest “Apocalypse”. Enlightenment Isn’t Glorious, But A Bloody Rude Look In The HBO Max Series Finale Research group. In the final hours of the dark comedy, created by Sarah-Violet Bliss and Charles Rogers, Dory (Alia Shawkat) brings about the end […]]]>

SPOILER ALERT: This message contains details about the latest round of Research group, including the latest “Apocalypse”.

Enlightenment Isn’t Glorious, But A Bloody Rude Look In The HBO Max Series Finale Research group.

In the final hours of the dark comedy, created by Sarah-Violet Bliss and Charles Rogers, Dory (Alia Shawkat) brings about the end of the world, after her quest to spread joy and love in pill form fails. turns against him.

In truth Research group Fashion, Dory’s intentions to do good to others, and selfishly herself, again evolve into a much more complicated and fatal scenario that puts everyone around her at risk.

“I hate to say it babe, but you did it again,” said Portia (Meredith Hagner), Dory’s staunch friend and short-lived lover. “Except it’s a lot worse this time.

After escaping an entertainment house riddled with Dory-loving zombies, Portia and Elliott (John Early) catch up with Dory and Drew (John Reynolds) handing out “ideas” to enthusiastic consumers and fanatics. Elliott reveals that he replaced his friends’ pills the day before with placebos, preventing them from turning into flesh-seeking zombies that rampage through the city around them. Fearing for their lives, the gang flees to Elliott and Marc (Jeffrey Self).

They watch the news, which warns of a rapidly spreading “unidentified personality disorder”, until they are chased away by Marc and Elliott’s adopted son, turned zombie.

At this point, it’s pretty clear that Shawkat wasn’t lying when she previously spoke to TBEN about “[wraping] this world while destroying it at the same time. Dory and her friends roam the streets of New York City where they are greeted by seemingly endless chaos and bloodshed around every corner.

To make matters worse, Marc reveals he ate an entire bag of jelly beans he found on the floor – yes, he means those pills. Moments later, he begins to cough up blood and chase after Elliott and the group of friends. Before he can maim the main characters, he is run over by a car full of former Dory supporters.

The finale continues with Dory, Drew, Portia and Elliott running towards a bridge, led by a background character played by series co-creator Charles Rogers. Arriving in the quarantine zone, Dory, Drew, and Elliott are safe, but the guards take Portia away pretending she looks brainless and like a zombie. After everything they’ve been through, the trio decide to save their friend and they reunite, just briefly before being surrounded by zombies. As things seem to be drawing to a close for the inseparable group, a masked savior repels the zombies with a blowtorch. Chantal (Clare McNulty), who has been groomed by all the end-time talk and conspiracies of late wife Liquorice Montague (Kathy Griffin), takes the friends to her underground shelter. There, she and Dory bicker over who really brought the end of the world, a cheeky reference to the first season, and questions surrounding Dory’s initial intentions to track down a then-missing Chantal.

“Now the world is ending because of me,” admits Dory

“No, the world is ending because of me,” Chantal refutes.

Once settled in, the friends reflect on how long the chaos will last and whether what appears to be the end of the world was meant to unfold like this. And while it’s easy to expect Jeff Goldblum’s Tunnell Quinn to reveal the violent infatuation was just another of his sims, the finale moves months later to a New York wilderness. and post-apocalyptic where Dory and Drew get married and Portia and Elliott witness the extremely intimate ceremony.

The gang returns home but before entering the security zone, they are rinsed with disinfectant spray and scanned fleas confirm their human status. The friends think about their next steps and their future, just before they stumble upon a wall covered with hundreds or even thousands of “missing posters”.

In the obvious reminder to one of the Research groupFrom the first photos, Dory takes a look at the different instructions. However, instead of starting a quest to find one of the missing, Dory continues to catch up with her friends, who have accompanied her through unimaginable hells and returned. This is when the search ends.

Give your opinion on Research groupThe latest genre change in the series is co-creator, executive producer, writer, director and co-showrunner Charles Rogers. It explains how the start of the pandemic inspired the onscreen zombie apocalypse, and how the End of the World connects to the show’s general themes of narcissism and selflessness. Read a brief Q&A below, which has been edited for length and clarity.

TBEN: How did you and Sarah-Violet come up with the idea that a zombie apocalypse would tie the whole series together?

ROGER: We knew we wanted Dory to relive her near-death experience and become enlightened with great existential purpose Marianne Williamson-style, but once COVID started to spread in the very beginning of 2020, we started to seed. the idea that Dory and her friends are causing a worldwide virus and basically ending up with the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse on some level. We obviously weren’t expecting COVID to become what it has become, so as we all headed for lockdown, we realized that a more female-friendly dish for this experience – like zombies – would be nice. . more fun to watch.

TBEN: Why did you think a horror tour was the best way to revisit some of the big themes of the show: growing up and narcissism?

ROGER: The show’s commentary on adulthood comes to a head with friends “all becoming adults” at the same time as they bring about the end of the world, and there is something significant about the idea. that the culmination of all their choices, experiences and denial would amount to an apocalypse. There has always been an irony that in order to be fulfilled you may have to hurt yourself and others, and that any act of selflessness can always be intrinsically linked to narcissism.

It’s not necessarily a nihilistic take on life, especially because the show also celebrates what’s beautiful, cranky, and hilarious about human nature. But there is something interesting about an anarchist invitation like this that can make you think about the meaning of anything and what we are made of at any level.

And maybe the spiral still leads to doomsday horror.

TBEN: You mentioned earlier that last season’s satire takes on “how it feels like you’ve been at the height of black madness in this country for a few years”. How does that lend itself to the final?

ROGER: When designing the collective hysteria that you see at the end of the series, we thought more about classic end times examples like the movie. The day of the grasshopper or the paintings of Hieronymus Bosch or the Book of Revelations, than to say the riots on the Capitol. There is a balance in the writing of the series, where we want to do something that feels both timeless but also pointed to the present moment. So we didn’t want this to sound like a carbon copy of Covid’s hysteria, protests, and political divide – something important would have gotten lost in the translation had we tried to replicate our current state of being. .

Instead, the season takes a more fantastical approach – the aesthetic has never been so colorful, contagion begins in the form of jelly beans, and the final scene almost feels like a dream. Hopefully all of this gives the season the right distance from the real world where people can step back and reflect on the madness and trauma we’ve been through over the past few years.


Source link

]]>
3 Reasons Explored Why The Matrix Became Beloved https://willtoexist.com/3-reasons-explored-why-the-matrix-became-beloved/ Thu, 06 Jan 2022 20:49:31 +0000 https://willtoexist.com/3-reasons-explored-why-the-matrix-became-beloved/ The first time Neo met Morpheus, Morpheus assessed why Neo agreed to meet him, in which he has this to say – “You’ve felt it all your life, that there is something wrong with the world. You don’t know what it is, but it’s there like a thorn in your mind driving you crazy. It […]]]>

The first time Neo met Morpheus, Morpheus assessed why Neo agreed to meet him, in which he has this to say – “You’ve felt it all your life, that there is something wrong with the world. You don’t know what it is, but it’s there like a thorn in your mind driving you crazy. It was that feeling that brought you to me. ” In the movie, Morpheus said this because Neo feels the world isn’t real, but to audiences that’s what it’s like to be a teenager. Aside from all the bullet time and anime references, the allure of The matrix is that he tapped on the feeling of adolescence.

All who ever lived were once a child who felt small and helpless at the mercy of a big world running on nested systems in which we cannot begin to wrap our minds, controlled by beings who are like us but with so much more power and never seem to. tell us the whole truth. To be a teenager is to be mature enough to be aware of this fact – to understand how the world works, but to be cut off from any tangible control or influence over it, yet ready to leap in and do something.

The matrix was supposed to be accessible to bored white men who fantasize about Kung Fu, but ended up speaking to a whole generation. We’ve all been there, we said to each other, “I’m the only person who knows what’s going on. The whole world is here to have me. Anything that is unfair and absurd is proof of that.

Being told that the world isn’t as light and fluffy as we think it is, but it’s actually tough and terrible with a huge system in place to chew on people to keep themselves going and it’s all about you are too calm to notice it, it is everyone’s socio-political awakening in adulthood or college.

Thomas Anderson’s journey to Neo and his rise to become The One is a fantastic extrapolation of each person who adopts their identity and outlook after being blown away by their cool college professor. Congratulations, you are awake. Plus you are the most special snowflake the revolution has been waiting for. At the end of the day, the strongest drug is said: “You have been right from the start.


Source link

]]>
One year after the Capitol uprising, the threat comes from inside the building | Michael C. Dorf | Verdict https://willtoexist.com/one-year-after-the-capitol-uprising-the-threat-comes-from-inside-the-building-michael-c-dorf-verdict/ Wed, 05 Jan 2022 10:01:45 +0000 https://willtoexist.com/one-year-after-the-capitol-uprising-the-threat-comes-from-inside-the-building-michael-c-dorf-verdict/ The first anniversary of the January 6 Capitol uprising naturally inspired many reflections on the meaning and consequences of that fateful day. But neither can be fully known yet. It all depends on what comes next. The 1993 World Trade Center (WTC) bombing killed six and injured over a thousand, but on its first anniversary, […]]]>

The first anniversary of the January 6 Capitol uprising naturally inspired many reflections on the meaning and consequences of that fateful day. But neither can be fully known yet. It all depends on what comes next. The 1993 World Trade Center (WTC) bombing killed six and injured over a thousand, but on its first anniversary, the event was mostly seen as a one-time event. It was only after the September 11, 2001 attacks that the 1993 explosion was understood as a deadly warning and ignored.

Will history repeat itself and intensify when it comes to the assault on American democracy? The WTC attacks are instructive. Even knowing that the jihadists were targeting the WTC, US counterterrorism officials missed signs that the next attack would use hijacked planes rather than a truck bomb. Likewise, the next assault on American democracy could use a different weapon and come from a different direction. Next time, the attack could come from inside the Capitol and other institutions of American democracy.

Politics in political violence

During the Senate trial for the second impeachment of former President Donald Trump, his defense team argued that he did not incite the Capitol uprising because the language he used to urge his Supporters to “fight” their perceived enemies was simply rhetoric, no different from similar terms used by Democratic politicians in support of protesters against racial injustice and police misconduct at rallies throughout 2020.

The claim is absolutely not convincing. As long-standing case law makes clear, whether an actor commits the crime of incitement depends not only on the particular words used, but also on the context. In none of the examples identified by Trump’s lawyers could one plausibly interpret the speaker’s words as promoting actual violence. On the other hand, Trump urged supporters at January 6 rally to “fight like hell” and “go down to the Capitol”, where he knew there was a “wild manifestation” going on that he himself had encouraged.

Moreover, even though Trump’s January 6, 2021 speech did not satisfy the Supreme Court Brandenburg test for criminal charges, article of impeachmentTrump’s charge of “inciting insurgency” referred to Trump’s broader conduct aimed at undermining the outcome of free and fair elections. Because the commission of a crime is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for an impeachment conviction, it is entirely possible that Trump may have a good defense against a narrow charge of incitement to crime, even if his actions allowed the Senate to convict him on the basis of the impeachment article passed by the House.

Ultimately, of course, more than enough Republican senators feared a backlash from Trump and his supporters to escape conviction. Citing the historically dubious claim that a former public servant is not liable to a conviction by indictment, even senators like Mitch McConnell, who condemned Trump’s behavior, voted to acquit him.

Where does that leave things? Visible crackpots like the “QAnon Shaman” will go to jail. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has accepted guilty pleas from more than 150 of the more than 700 other rioters he has charged, including a member of the Proud Boys whose cooperation can help secure convictions against some of the insurgency’s other most violent participants. It is even possible that criminal charges may be laid against former government officials and / or current members of Congress who organized or facilitated the insurgency. And, of course, the Special House Committee, undeterred by the obstruction of Steve Bannon, Mark Meadows and other Trump followers, may uncover further evidence of complicity at the highest levels.

Yet while the DOJ and the House Select Committee rightly pursue these various forms of accountability, we must not lose sight of the highest stakes. The Capitol uprising was a tragedy for the police and others injured and killed, their families and the many people, including members of Congress, who suffered intense psychological trauma. But in that regard, it was not much different from other horrific acts of violence in a country where around 20,000 people are murdered each year.

For direct victims, lethal violence is lethal violence. From a societal perspective, however, Politics violence is different. The organized Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests in 2020 were extremely peaceful. What we saw of breaking the law was generally the work of opportunistic looters. I don’t wish to downplay the detrimental effect of such conduct, but Trump apologists’ comparison of breaches of the BLM protests and the Capitol insurgency ignores the fact that the former included virtually no violence. political, with the exception of a few independent marginal anarchists.

Despite a common translation error of the Prussian general and strategist Carl von Clausewitz, war is not politics by other means. The violence of war and violence in the broad sense can be aimed at the acquisition of political power, but in a democracy political violence is an oxymoron. To practice democratic politics is to accept a common set of ground rules for the peaceful resolution of political differences. When the loser of an election uses violence to try to change the outcome, democratic politics stops working.

Fire next time

Preventing an exact repeat of January 6, 2021 should be relatively straightforward. Track investigation, crowd control, physical barriers and a massive security presence can ensure that a crowd does not storm the Capitol again. But just as counterterrorism officials who had the experience of a bomb planted inside the WTC failed to prevent hijacked planes from attacking from outside the buildings, so in 2025, too narrow a focus on preventing rioters from breaching the Capitol’s external defenses risks overlooking the threat within our supposedly democratic institutions.

We learned last year that some of Trump’s more extreme stalwarts in Congress, such as Lauren Boebert, Paul Gosar, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Jim Jordan, may have been actively involved in the insurgency. But we already knew that Republican members of Congress were keen to overthrow American democracy even before the physical attack.

Two days before last year’s uprising, Verdict published a column that I wrote titled The challenges of January 6. In it, I have mainly focused on the peaceful means by which many Republicans have sought to overthrow American democracy. I was also worried that “Trump’s brown shirts [might] answer his call and light the capital ”if his authoritarian allies in Congress fail to block the certification of the State Electoral College votes that Trump falsely claimed to have been stolen from him. I predicted that the following years would see a battle for the soul of the GOP, pitting social and economic conservatives against outright authoritarians.

This battle is increasingly one-sided, with the authoritarians winning. Indeed, even on January 6 itself, 139 members of the Republican Chamber and eight Republican senators– people whose lives were in danger hours earlier because of a crowd inspired by Trump’s big lie – voted to overturn the election result on the basis of that same lie. While Trump never or even sometimes Trump but not when he attacks democracy, Republicans retire or face major challenges from Trump-backed fire-eaters, the ranks of authoritarians are swelling. If the GOP takes control of one or both houses of Congress in the midterm elections later this year, it will likely use its power to shut down inquiries and, assuming it retains power in 2024, could give effect to a second edition of the Big Lie of January 6, 2025.

Indeed, even without control over Congress, there is a growing existential threat to American democracy, as the number of Trumparatchiks in state legislatures and in positions responsible for administering elections increases. Consider an aphorism worthy of three Gifts. In the original 1971 Godfather film, Don Corleone says “a lawyer with a briefcase can steal over a hundred gunmen”. In his 1989 song Give me what you got, former Eagle Don Henley changed “lawyer” to “man”. The Third Don, former President Trump, seems to have adapted the lesson as follows: A state legislature without a commitment to democracy can steal an election more effectively than a mob armed with stolen flag poles, fire extinguishers and police shields.

The efforts of the DOJ and the House Select Committee to hold the planners and perpetrators of the Capitol Hill insurgency accountable are essential to the preservation of American democracy, but they are not enough for the task. The willingness to resort to political violence is a terrible symptom. Trumpist authoritarianism is the underlying disease.


Source link

]]>
Analysts hail country’s first-ever national security policy https://willtoexist.com/analysts-hail-countrys-first-ever-national-security-policy/ Tue, 28 Dec 2021 17:47:25 +0000 https://willtoexist.com/analysts-hail-countrys-first-ever-national-security-policy/ Najam ul Saqib (former Ambassador) The policy of “comprehensive national security” has not yet been revealed to the public and no one can offer any prophecy about it. Yet this is a constructive development in Pakistan’s history, as national security policy is essential for every country to ensure its survival by suppressing tacit or explicit […]]]>

Najam ul Saqib (former Ambassador) The policy of “comprehensive national security” has not yet been revealed to the public and no one can offer any prophecy about it. Yet this is a constructive development in Pakistan’s history, as national security policy is essential for every country to ensure its survival by suppressing tacit or explicit existential threats. In addition, Pakistan’s civilian and military leaders noted their consensus on one single issue. The rationale for formulating this policy can be illustrated by the fact that Pakistan has focused its shift from geopolitics to geoeconomics. Thus, while pursuing geo-economic policies to achieve the relevant objectives, Pakistan will face obstacles at the tactical level. Thus, to counter these tactical obstacles, this policy document will help design a mitigation strategy. It will be a radical statement if this policy is called a guiding principle for foreign and nuclear policy, because the precursors of these policies are still in flux and intangible. Overall, the recently approved Comprehensive National Security Policy will include a range of policies to deter traditional and non-traditional security threats.

Dr Syed Hussain Shaheed Soherwordi (reporter at The News / IR Expert): The National Security Committee should be commended for having reached the milestone of producing a conclusive document on national security policy in 16 long years. Previously, the lack of innovations in the political framework limited the vision of our statesmen as well as that of our nationals of national security as a reinforcement of the military force. Issues like climate change, gender discrimination and other issues that were considered low politics discussions will be conglomerated with high politics. As the policy itself is multifaceted, the contribution also comes from different ministries. Thus, the bureaucratic and organizational interests of the ministries will become coherent and lead to the acquisition of objectives of national interest.

Brig Retd Harris Nawaz (Defense Analyst) It was very clear since the unceremonious exodus of the United States from Afghanistan that the United States would use tools of economic subversion to cover up its humiliation. The United States and its allied states are forcing Afghanistan to design the structural stratification and functional specifications of the new Afghanistan in accordance with their political dictates. The small United States knows that an unstable Afghanistan could fall back into the hands of anarchist organizations like ISIS, ETIM, etc. The United States does not unfreeze Afghan funds under the guise of human rights concerns. Conversely, the United States itself has inflicted relentless human rights abuses and infrastructure destruction in Afghanistan. So, it is the moral obligation of the United States and the United Nations to clean up their mess. Pakistan is vigilant that the United States has always wanted an unstable Afghanistan to constrain Pakistan. Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan has openly let the world know that Pakistan wants peace in the whole region. MENA countries that were seen as sympathizers of Afghanistan are also waiting for a green signal from the United States. It is high time that the 57 Muslim states of the world unite for a common cause while leaving behind their parochial national interest to challenge the shackles of the Western world order.

Brig Retd Mahmood Shah (Expert RI) The start of the OIC Extraordinary Session is an inexplicable diplomatic triumph for Pakistan at the international level. It is quite evident that the position of the United States and its allies has been relaxed as a result of diplomatic pressure from Pakistan. The PTI-led government should be commended for its laudable efforts for war-torn Afghanistan. Afghanistan has remained the graveyard of the Great Empires and even in contemporary times the two superpowers have wreaked havoc on the land of the Afghan people. The recent Taliban takeover has been accompanied by a severe economic recession and some fear that, left unattended, it could turn into a humanitarian crisis. Western powers have always tried to destabilize Third World countries by dividing them on the basis of border demarcations. The West should stop insinuating border disputes and should focus on a policy of appeasement to repent of their demonic activities.


Source link

]]>
Byker Grove Bonkers Finale: “We came out kicking and screaming” https://willtoexist.com/byker-grove-bonkers-finale-we-came-out-kicking-and-screaming/ Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:52:53 +0000 https://willtoexist.com/byker-grove-bonkers-finale-we-came-out-kicking-and-screaming/ In its own way, Byker grove was genuinely iconic: it tackled big problems and generated real superstars and memorable TV moments, while still relying on humor and playfulness. To those who work there and to those who grew up watching it, Ferryman was important. By the mid-2000s, however, viewership figures had started to decline and […]]]>

In its own way, Byker grove was genuinely iconic: it tackled big problems and generated real superstars and memorable TV moments, while still relying on humor and playfulness. To those who work there and to those who grew up watching it, Ferryman was important. By the mid-2000s, however, viewership figures had started to decline and interest in the BBC had waned considerably. “They wanted to stop doing teen shows.” Bloom explains, “They wanted to start the CBBC channel, just for the kids stuff, let’s say six-twelve, and let EastEnders and Hollyoaks pick up teens. they did not want Byker grove more because it was too adolescent; too problem-oriented.

“A lot of it stems from a misreading of audience research,” says Johnson. “They asked thirteen and fourteen year olds if they thought the programs Byker grove and Barn Hill were for them, and of cours they said no. They said they were watching adult programs like Friends, not the BBC for children, but of cours they always watched it, and of course they got something out of the intrigues; they learned something.

The creative team agreed to change course to Ferrymanof the eighteenth series in order to save the series. “We did a silly and fun series,” says Bloom, who was brought in to lead the race, “there was a Full Metal Jacket episode, and a Kill bill episode; it was actually a really good show. Johnson, too, was happy to push the boundaries. “We experimented with storytelling techniques,” he explains, “and I think we did some interesting things. We got a BAFTA nomination for one episode. Everything was breaking down the fourth wall and talking to the camera. We did a flashback episode, we did one where the story was told from three different character perspectives. Alas, it was not enough.

“It wasn’t until we came to sit down to tell the story of the last four episodes that I was told that these were really the last four episodes,” Johnson said. “The BBC decided not to wait until we were done,” Bloom explains. “They had made the financial decision to cancel the show.” The team now had to find a way to end not only Series 18, but the previous thirteen years of storytelling, with no space to prepare for a finale. “It’s the craziest thing, looking back now,” he says. “You went from Ken Loach, Mike Lee, Andrea Arnold, a socially realistic drama a la Shane Meadows, then… BANG. None of you are real. You have to fight for your existence.

the Ferryman team was unlucky – it’s extremely rare to be canceled halfway through UK TV. “It’s always after,” says Russell T. Davies, arguably the UK’s biggest authority on TV fiction and someone who knows a thing or two about the finals. “You do your streak and then you go through that waiting period. If it goes well you assume you’re probably fine, if it goes bad you know you’re probably knocked out, but most of the shows will be in the middle, and that’s very, very difficult. Getting canceled halfway just doesn’t happen.

Back when he was a writer working on soap operas and dramas like Revelations, Springhill, Families and Great, Davies’ finals, by necessity, had to function as both a point and an ellipse. “With a lot of these cheap soap operas, we were pretty carefully designing a finale that could either be a thriller for the next series or a real ending,” he says, “Families [the ITV daytime soap Davies inherited in the early 90s]ended brilliantly with the murder by the stepmother of his stepdaughter, who had slept with the stepfather. At the same time, we had a character, Jackie, who inherited ten million Australian dollars, so we were all ready for Jackie the millionaire in the next series. It could have run and run. Revelations [a late-night soap Davies developed for Granada in 1994] lasted for two years, and the two years ended with a murder that the killer gets away with, which gave us something for the next series. We made sure they hit a high point, but you racked up enough to come back. “


Source link

]]>
Biden shouldn’t use Democracy Summit to start more cold wars https://willtoexist.com/biden-shouldnt-use-democracy-summit-to-start-more-cold-wars/ Wed, 08 Dec 2021 16:32:58 +0000 https://willtoexist.com/biden-shouldnt-use-democracy-summit-to-start-more-cold-wars/ U.S. President Joe Biden delivers remarks on the economy and high commodity prices while on vacation at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building December 1, 2021, in Washington, DC (Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images) To subscribe to The nation Subscribe now for as low as $ 2 per month! Thank you for signing up The nationthe […]]]>

On Wednesday and Thursday of this week, US President Joe Biden will host a virtual “”Summit for Democracy. “The gathering will bring together leaders from 110 countries who work in government, civil society and the private sector, with the formally stated purpose of developing an agenda to renew democratic government and keep the ideals of democracy strong. ( the guest list includes Pakistan, Ukraine, and Brazil.) As authoritarianism grows around the world, including in the United States, the administration says it is looking for convenient ideas and strong alliances against its spread.

But how to reconcile this resounding project with Biden’s mantra of “America is backAs he met just a few months ago the Group of Seven in Cornwall, NATO allies in Brussels and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Geneva? Biden has received much praise for leading a return to normalcy after Donald Trump’s reign of error. The question is, however, what is normalcy, and “America is back” for what? Biden’s focus at European meetings has bolstered NATO allies for a new global showdown with Russia and, increasingly, China. Despite the existential threats posed by catastrophic climate change (which Biden and other world leaders have insufficiently addressed at COP26) And one ongoing global pandemic, Biden’s new normal seems ominously leaning towards a revival of Cold War politics.

“We are committed to the rules-based international order,” concludes the final press release NATO meetings in June, but “Russia’s aggressive actions pose a threat to Euro-Atlantic security.” China’s growing influence and international policies may present challenges that we must tackle together as an alliance ”. Much of NATO’s plan was to strengthen the alliance’s growing military capabilities on Russia’s borders, and NATO for the first time also designated China as a “systemic challenge”.

As the Democracy Summit meets, the old Cold War tropes are indeed being recycled. In a rare seal editorial article, the ambassadors of China and Russia in the United States describe the summit as “[a]n obvious product of his Cold War mentality, [which] will stir up ideological confrontation and a divide in the world, creating new “dividing lines”.


Source link

]]>
PERPETUITY No-Budget Dystopia Offers Temporary Dressing https://willtoexist.com/perpetuity-no-budget-dystopia-offers-temporary-dressing/ Tue, 07 Dec 2021 18:02:01 +0000 https://willtoexist.com/perpetuity-no-budget-dystopia-offers-temporary-dressing/ Famous and acclaimed Hungarian director György Pálfi created his latest work, Perpetuity, in the main competition of the Estonian Film Festival. Pálfi has become the rare breed of a filmmaker whose works are sought after, even if funding does not come easily. After a fairly avant-garde adaptation of Stanislaw Lem’s philosophical science fiction The voice […]]]>

Famous and acclaimed Hungarian director György Pálfi created his latest work, Perpetuity, in the main competition of the Estonian Film Festival.

Pálfi has become the rare breed of a filmmaker whose works are sought after, even if funding does not come easily. After a fairly avant-garde adaptation of Stanislaw Lem’s philosophical science fiction The voice of his master, the Hungarian pioneer returns to lo-fi cinema.

Initially planned for 2016, Perpetuity, then known as For Ever (according to a short story from Sándor Tar), was awaiting post-production in 2015 (read the news). The project seemed to fall into oblivion until it was learned that Pálfi was finalizing a batch of three films, Perpetuity being one of them.

Set in the near future, Ocsenás wanders a post-apocalyptic Hungarian countryside collecting debris amid wreckage of downed planes. Europe has been at war for a few years, and Ocsenás helped out at a local hospital. Injured soldiers continue to arrive, but the circumstances of their injuries and trauma are not openly discussed.

The protagonist spends free time at a local pub that doubles as a pawnshop, where he trades junk for bottles of moonlight. The whole village seems to run on alcohol; no other currency is used in transactions.

gyorgi_palfi_perpetuity_1.jpg

The village with its dilapidated houses is sparsely inhabited; combat-unfit old men hang in the pub while the remaining civilians are terrorized by an unknown sniper. His most frequent targets are women and children, so Ocsenás doesn’t bother him. Fairly quickly, the protagonist finds a new pal, a local drunkard and a strange duck, and another lost existence in the desert, Béres who keeps a surviving flight attendant as his personal pet.

There isn’t much action in the sorry world of Perpetuity. Ocsenás navigates the place of boredom and with a little sense, the veneer of civilization and humanity is unraveling. Pálfi’s latest film appears to be an attempt to marry genre cinema with an existential slow cinema concept with an obvious political bent.

The village seems to live in a bubble in its own right and it is not difficult to find parallels with the present day, when the society is too polarized and radicalized. The main protagonist tries to find some happiness and zest for life in the grim reality that often leads him to act like a big kid.

Perpetuity is a two-faced romance, a love story at the end of the world with Ocsenás wooing a nurse in a weird way and on a weird bromance with the violent Béres. The desire for human contact and companionship persists in desperate times. The film’s lack of plot corresponds to the aimless journey, a void that Béres tries to fill with constant alcohol consumption and unprovoked violence.

gyorgi_palfi_perpetuity_2.jpg

The film shares a weak vibe of disillusionment with humanity (or Orbán’s Hungary), resembling an Eastern European version of Cormac McCarthy’s film. The road, while Pálfi frames the story in the ideal state of community cohabitation. Instead of McCarthy’s light as a symbol of faith, the characters in Pálfi’s world circulate a bottle of alcohol, as if a social lubricant is something necessary to preserve sanity – or prevent a sober assessment of the situation. – in the face of insignificance environment.

However, Perpetuity can only be a temporary dressing until the release of Pálfi’s other films. The director said filming and post-production was a no-budget affair he went through with a tight-knit and dedicated film crew.

The finalized work exceeds the notions and expectations of a DIY exercise without a budget. In this direction, Perpetuity is a triumph of cinema without a budget.

Anna Nyitrai won the award for best production design for her work on Perpetuity at the 2021 Tallinn Black Nights Film Festival.

Anarchy logo screen

Do you think this content is inappropriate or infringes your rights? Click here to report it, or see our DMCA policy.


Source link

]]>
Niccolò Machiavelli was the philosopher of leftist populism https://willtoexist.com/niccolo-machiavelli-was-the-philosopher-of-leftist-populism/ Thu, 02 Dec 2021 19:14:51 +0000 https://willtoexist.com/niccolo-machiavelli-was-the-philosopher-of-leftist-populism/ JM I am indeed a defender of populism, of leftist populism. The difference between left and right populism is simple. Progressive populism is a chauvinistic majority movement that challenges the unfair advantages enjoyed by a wealthy and powerful elite minority. Right-wing populism, on the contrary, is a predominantly chauvinistic movement that challenges the imaginary privileges […]]]>

JM

I am indeed a defender of populism, of leftist populism. The difference between left and right populism is simple. Progressive populism is a chauvinistic majority movement that challenges the unfair advantages enjoyed by a wealthy and powerful elite minority. Right-wing populism, on the contrary, is a predominantly chauvinistic movement that challenges the imaginary privileges enjoyed by vulnerable immigrants or religious and ethnic minorities. I think Machiavelli’s writings anticipate left-wing populism because it encourages plebeians to challenge the elites and demand from them an ever greater share of economic and political power.

Machiavelli quite convincingly demonstrates that popular governments are the constant targets of (although he did not use the term) “vast right-wing conspiracies” – anytime, anywhere, anytime. From this perspective, plutocratically generated systemic corruption is simply a constant existential threat to any civic regime that is not already a naked oligarchy. The only way to stop or roll back this corruption is for the common people to mobilize and use whatever leverage at their disposal – military service or labor force, for example – to obtain concessions from elites who would prefer s ‘expand rather than relinquish their disproportionate authority.

Of course, the old republics analyzed by Machiavelli never had to deal with “right-wing populism”. The socio-economic elites of these republics could invoke patriotism or anti-tyranny to thwart reformist demands on the part of the demos or the the plebs; That is, they could prioritize the need for war against hostile foreign enemies or invoke the danger of populist leaders accumulating royal power while defending the plight of the lower classes.

The Roman Senate masterfully exercised both strategies, frequently diverting plebeians from tumulus at home to wage war abroad, and often gets away with killing popular champions, from Marcus Manlius Capitolinus to the Gracchi brothers, as “budding tyrants.” But such oligarchs have never been able to fully mobilize large segments of the people in a sustained movement against popular reforms and popular reformers. They eventually had to resort to violent repression to do so, as evidenced by Sylla’s tyranny.

On the other hand, contemporary right-wing populists have a powerful weapon to wield against center-left parties and popular left-wing movements: namely, the accusation of disloyalty or national treason. Because modern democrats and socialists are motivated by the universalist principles of the Enlightenment, they are perpetually liable to accuse of not really devoting themselves to the well-being of the “people” in their own country. They are all too easily accused of ultimately caring for “humanity” (for people around the world) or subordinate national minorities. Hence the effectiveness of right-wing populists in defaming center-left politicians and left-wing populists as treacherous “globalists” or as anti-majority adherents of “identity politics”.


Source link

]]>
Finding Common Ground: Can a Third Way Save Us? | Opinion https://willtoexist.com/finding-common-ground-can-a-third-way-save-us-opinion/ Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:31:00 +0000 https://willtoexist.com/finding-common-ground-can-a-third-way-save-us-opinion/ Our two-party system is not working and is quickly collapsing beyond repair. Most importantly, our people are beyond polarized dislike and headed for a possibly violent ‘debrief’ that is being built over the past 30 years. How did we get to this low point? How did we gut what was left of American exceptionalism, leaving […]]]>

Our two-party system is not working and is quickly collapsing beyond repair. Most importantly, our people are beyond polarized dislike and headed for a possibly violent ‘debrief’ that is being built over the past 30 years.

How did we get to this low point? How did we gut what was left of American exceptionalism, leaving an empty shell of who we once were? How did parties come to field so few candidates to rational moderate voters? How did so many adults become radicalized violent enemies of the opposition?

At the head of a party is a 78-year-old, sometimes coherent and mentally inept Liberal Democrat, a political hacker with 50 years of experience in the federal government who has apparently retained little knowledge or useful skills in governance. . He is assisted by a progressive “awakened” vice president with all the charm, consideration and warmth of the California Condor.

The other side is under the thumb of a 75-year-old amoral ignorant and malicious narcissist who spits hatred and encourages violence. Those who support him because they “like a lot of his policies” remind me of those who supported or tolerated fascism before WWII for bringing pride back to Germany and restoring some semblance of order. Trump’s evil runs deep among his 40 million voting supporters and others. He is an existential threat to the Constitution, American democracy, and world peace. To deny this is to drink your one-sided bossy Kool Aid. He ignores reality. Agreements made with the devil or a cruel tyrant end up in disaster. Ask the German people.

Clinton was a pragmatic centrist who followed Bush 41, another moderate who fell into the broad middle where most Americans were comfortable after World War II. Nixon was also a centrist, able to negotiate, confer, and compromise with Democrats and even Communist China. Today, either party has little interest in communicating honestly and seeking compromise. Doing so invites you to be treated as a traitor and to see your life threatened. Before Clinton, there were fundamental polarizing dynamics that play a big part in the great decoupling we are seeing today. Among them: the assassinations of JFK, MLK and RFK – 1963 and 1968; assassination attempts against Reagan and Ford – 1975 and 1981; Johnson’s Big Society Programs – 1963 – 1968; The Vietnam War, revolutionary left-wing violence – mid-1960s – 1975; the civil rights movement – mainly the 1960s; Nixon’s Silent Majority – 1968; Roe vs. Wade – 1973; Urban riots in dozens of cities – mainly from 1964 to 1968; Falwell and Robertson found the Christian Coalition – 1977; Affirmative action and other leveling programs – started in 1969.

New religious, class, racial and political movements have paved the way for an explosive growth of extremist ideologies and adherents. With Clinton came impeachment and the generation of multiple conspiracy theories linking the Clintons to murders, drug trafficking and criminal cover-ups. Clinton has been called an illegitimate president, allowing his extremist opposition to define him and his fellow Democrats as immoral usurpers of power, anti-freedom socialists and baby killers. The opposition turned into hatred and moral condemnation.

At the center of this new form of vehement morally sanctioned opposition was Rush Limbaugh and the blueprint he provided for right-wing talk radio to thrive and broadcast new forms of ideological warfare, disinformation, and infotainment. At its peak, Limbaugh reached 15.5 million weekly listeners. It was a gospel of unfettered capitalism, of the moral superiority of a forgotten America “hovered over”, the condemnation of an overambitious federal government, the personal responsibility of the poor, and the superiority of traditional Christian “Western values”. The subtext was conspiracy theories mixed with ridicule for minority concerns and a bit of proven American racism. The silent majority found redemption and the assertion that they were the elect and began to become a hostile, vengeful force. The internet and social media have expanded this echo chamber into gathering places for resentful and feeble-minded travel companions. Confirmation bias was now everywhere and exploited by all media.

In the years that followed, new dynamics and movements eroded the community and consensus required by democracy. Factors of left polarization include: affirmative action moving first towards “equality”, then “fairness” and rejection of meritocracy; calls for redress for past racial injustices; play the endless “racism card” recklessly and intentionally to seize power; mock the religious and cultural values ​​of Central America; extremely conflicting academic ideas and fantasies; push identity politics in a way that encourages any “minority”, regardless of size, to randomly accuse the majority of a hateful “ism” or to threaten the safe space it needs to function; suppress freedom of speech, especially conservative speeches, ideas and discussions in colleges and universities; allow each “victim” of the “oppressive majority” a preponderant place at the table and the presumption that their status as victim should not be called into question; ANTIFA and other violent socialist and anarchist organizations; many more examples of progressive extremism.

Examples of growing right-wing extremism include: paramilitary militias, Sovereign Citizens’ movement, neo-Nazis, white nationalism, anti-Semitism, skinheads, all engaged in violent resolution of disagreements and to varying degrees overthrowing the government federal; the paranoia of the Second Amendment; Qanon and other groups focused on conspiracy beliefs; Cultist, unconditional support for Trump throughout the Republican Party; Christian political action groups and ministries that fund a far-right agenda based on their moral superiority over the immoral left that want to cancel Christmas while savoring their freedom to choose infanticide as part of the right to choose a woman’s ; most members of the Republican caucus in the House of Representatives; Evangelical Christianity which often includes a mixture of racism, earthly thought, tribalism, intolerance, apocalyptic fixations and encouragement of righteous violence when applied to wicked sinners, primarily Democrats; a refusal to accept that many Americans have historically been hurt or worse by the white Christian majority; in search of a theocracy which integrates Church and State.

I see little hope. A viable third-party movement would take a decade or more to develop, and financial interests will not easily let go of the status quo. We are where we are because of who we are. Our polarized elected officials represent and reflect us to a large extent. Today there are fewer and fewer places for the moderate, reasonable and thoughtful citizen. We exist but if we don’t find a third option in search of common ground, we are on the verge of collapse. I am a Republican on hold. Wait for the party to completely reject Trumpism. Good luck with that.

In the meantime, never forget that Trumpism is a force of evil and seeks to destroy democracy. Uncle Joe may procrastinate, babble, live in a liberal fantasy world, and advance policies you hate, but any real damage he can do is tiny and easily reversible from what a rampaging vindictive tyrant with no respect for the democracy or decency will do if he returns to power. Just ask the German people.

Trump is so dangerous that he is only an option for authoritarian, undemocratic, cult-loving Americans. Do not let his pathology spread.


Source link

]]>
“The Lawyer You Know” Peter Tragos talks about the Satoshi case in Florida with Kurt Wuckert Jr of CoinGeek. https://willtoexist.com/the-lawyer-you-know-peter-tragos-talks-about-the-satoshi-case-in-florida-with-kurt-wuckert-jr-of-coingeek/ Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:00:00 +0000 https://willtoexist.com/the-lawyer-you-know-peter-tragos-talks-about-the-satoshi-case-in-florida-with-kurt-wuckert-jr-of-coingeek/ The Kleiman v Wright trial is now nearing its conclusion. It’s been an interesting and insightful journey so far, and from the start Florida-based attorney Peter Tragos has shared his thoughts on how things are going. The self-proclaimed digital currency and blockchain novice shared weekly updates summarizing the discussions. This week, he was joined by […]]]>

The Kleiman v Wright trial is now nearing its conclusion. It’s been an interesting and insightful journey so far, and from the start Florida-based attorney Peter Tragos has shared his thoughts on how things are going.

The self-proclaimed digital currency and blockchain novice shared weekly updates summarizing the discussions. This week, he was joined by Kurt Wuckert Jr. of CoinGeek for a live discussion on Week 3.

The origins of digital money systems and Satoshi Nakamoto

After briefly introducing Kurt Wuckert Jr. to his audience, Peter Tragos invited him to explain a bit about the history of Bitcoin. While maintaining that he knows little about it, this was an opportunity for Tragos and his audience to hear about the history of Bitcoin from an expert in the field.

Kurt rightly pointed out that digital money systems date back to the 1970s. There have been many attempts to create them before, but none succeeded or lasted long until Bitcoin.

Going straight into the story, Kurt explained how there are a lot of theories about who Satoshi Nakamoto might be right off the bat. He explained how, in 2015, Wired and Gizmodo both doxxed Dr. Craig Wright as Satoshi Nakamoto. They also mentioned Dave Kleiman, sowing the seeds for the ongoing Kleiman v Wright trial.

Briefly covering the Bitcoin Civil War, Kurt informed Tragos that the community largely dismissed Dr. Wright as a fraudster because they didn’t like what he had to say. Being a big blocker who believes Bitcoin moves endlessly on the chain, many crypto-anarchists who hijacked Bitcoin in the beginning couldn’t accept Dr Wright as Satoshi Nakamoto.

What does the Kleiman vs. Wright case mean for Bitcoin?

Asking how the plaintiffs plan to raise if they win and how it would even be possible, Kurt told Tragos about some of the nuances of the case. Stakes :

  • The $ 65 billion worth of Bitcoin and IP.
  • What have the plaintiffs seen to prompt them to spend tens of millions on legal fees and years of time?
  • Is Dr. Wright really Satoshi Nakamoto, and what evidence does he have if so?

There is no doubt that the case will have massive implications for Bitcoin. Either Dr. Wright is its creator, in which case he is the greatest authority on Bitcoin, or he is not, which would mean the end of the road for this narrative.

The collection and the keys are not an identity

Insisting on how the plaintiffs plan to collect, Tragos said he was not sure the U.S. legal system is sophisticated enough to handle this. If Dr. Wright doesn’t want to pay in the end, how would the courts do it?

At this point, Kurt explained Dr. Wright’s long-standing position that you don’t need keys to move Bitcoin and that miners can be required by law to update the ledger. Bitcoin is subject to the law and does not exist outside of it, Kurt explained, and the idea that laws do not apply on Bitcoin is a myth.

Of course, Kurt pointed out that there could be a chain break with some miners refusing to comply. However, if that happens, they will eventually realize that they are exploiting the minority channel and losing money, and they will come back. This is how Bitcoin was designed to work, he informed Tragos, and regulated entities will follow the law.

Tragos then asked Kurt if the assets could be frozen by governments. “I don’t see why not,” Kurt replied, pointing out that governments have brought down Liberty Reserve and other supposedly decentralized systems.

What are the sides of Bitcoin? Civil war

Tragos asked Kurt to further explain the sides of Bitcoin. He mentioned that he was accused of bias by one party and that the other thanked him for his impartiality, which baffled him. He later said he was shocked at the intensity of tribalism in Bitcoin.

Briefly covering the Bitcoin civil war between small blockers and big blockers, Kurt explained the history of the fight for Bitcoin and how one party wants to limit Bitcoin to a block size of 1MB and chain it. Rather, the other wants to set him free and follow Satoshi’s original vision for unlimited scaling and a global economic tool and computing system.

“Our goal in BSV, in short, is to replace the Internet with Bitcoin“said Wuckert.

Explaining how Bitcoin made micropayments possible and how many original features were removed, Kurt explained how the story went from Bitcoin as a peer-to-peer payment system whether it is an investment asset. Highlighting the irony of this fraud case when Bitcoin was designed to be an anti-fraud tool, Kurt explained to Tragos how it might work to make cases like this much easier to resolve in the future.

Refocus on the case– do the complainants have any evidence?

Tragos asked Kurt if he had seen anything that would suggest that Ira Kleiman had a case, and Kurt said no, although he admitted his bias in favor of Dr. Wright.

While Kurt may indeed be biased, an objective analysis of the situation reveals that this claim is true. Oddly, the plaintiffs appear to have spent the first two weeks using emails as evidence before pointing out that they could be forged, thus undermining their own body of evidence for a Kleiman and Wright partnership.

Kurt went on to explain how the defense had so far demonstrated that there had been no partnership. He pointed out that all circumstantial evidence arose after Dave Kleiman’s death and that Dave’s close friend in Florida had sworn under oath that he couldn’t code and didn’t even mention Bitcoin in the last few years of his life.

Tragos, as a professional lawyer, stressed that he did not believe sympathy would win out for the complainant. He said that in his experience, juries do not look fondly on absent and contentious brothers.

While Dave Kleiman’s will names Ira as the sole beneficiary, Kurt pointed out that the evidence showed the relationship between the two was one of estrangement. Ira Kleiman was absent in the last days of his brother’s life, and Dr. Wright didn’t even know he existed despite a close friendship with Dave.

Is Dr Craig Wright Really Satoshi?

Towards the end of the one-on-one portion of the discussion, Tragos bluntly asked Kurt if he believed Dr. Wright to be Satoshi.

Emphasizing that he was initially not sure what role Dave Kleiman would play, Kurt told Tragos he thinks it is far more likely than not that Dr. Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto.

Why is that ? For Kurt, it boils down to the fact that Dr Wright knows things about Bitcoin that only Satoshi could know and the coding style of Bitcoin, which is an academic and old-fashioned style rather than that of a coder. commercial. Dr. Wright fits this profile perfectly.

Asking why the debate is so heated in Bitcoin over whether or not Dr. Wright is Satoshi, Tragos explained how baffled he was with some of the answers in his videos. Kurt tells him that he thinks Dr. Wright is an existential threat to the wealth of many who have become “really wealthy by accident,” hence the intensity of the campaign against him.

Summary

It was another informative and revealing video from Peter Tragos this week, and we look forward to it covering week four. This week is expected to be the most revealing of all, with Dr Wright once again taking the helm to be directly examined by the defense.

Will we know for sure that Dr. Wright is Satoshi by the end of this week? Stay tuned for real-time coverage.

CoinGeek features Kurt Wuckert Jr. in recap coverage that will air live daily at 6:30 p.m. EST on our Youtube channel.

Check out all of CoinGeek’s special reports on the Kleiman vs. Wright YouTube Playlist.

New to Bitcoin? Discover CoinGeek Bitcoin for beginners section, the ultimate resource guide to learning more about Bitcoin — as originally envisioned by Satoshi Nakamoto — and blockchain.


Source link

]]>